Furness Whisper

Directions Website

Furness Whisper history isn't just the past – it's a living story! Share vintage photos, uncover hidden tales, and discover the hidden gems of our towns.

Let's shape the narrative together, celebrating our heritage where past meets present.

📢 **CALLING ALL BARROW LOCALS – LET'S HEAR YOUR MEMORIES OF THE OLD CIVIC HALL!** ❤️I recently received a message from o...
12/10/2026

📢 **CALLING ALL BARROW LOCALS – LET'S HEAR YOUR MEMORIES OF THE OLD CIVIC HALL!** ❤️

I recently received a message from one of my followers who pointed out that the old **Civic Hall, better known today as Forum 28**, doesn't seem to get mentioned very often, especially with everything that's been going on surrounding its future. It got me thinking about just how many memories must be tucked away in people's minds, stories that have never been told and moments in time that deserve to be remembered.

Well, here's your chance to change that and help bring another little piece of Barrow's history back to life!

Over the years, the Civic Hall has been part of so many people's lives. From the excitement of attending a show or concert to the laughter, music and chatter filling the building during events and gatherings, I can only imagine how many wonderful memories were made within those walls. Perhaps you remember the anticipation of queuing outside, the sound of people chatting as they waited to go in, or the atmosphere inside when the lights went down and the entertainment began. Maybe you worked there, performed on its stage or simply remember passing the building on your way through town.

I was only a child back then, so my own memories are rather hazy. I can remember the building itself, although, if I'm completely honest, I don't think I ever actually went inside. What I do remember is the traffic passing directly in front of it, with buses and cars travelling along the road before the whole area was changed into what we know today. I can still picture the movement of the traffic, the buses rumbling past and the general hustle and bustle of the town centre as it used to be. It's funny how certain little details stay with you from childhood, even when everything around them has changed beyond recognition.

I also have a very faint memory of what I think might have been a betting shop next door to the Civic Hall. Now, whether I've remembered that correctly or whether I've got my wires crossed over the years, I honestly couldn't tell you! It's one of those memories sitting right at the back of my mind, almost like a faded photograph where you can make out the shapes but not quite all the details. Perhaps someone who remembers the area better than I do can put me right on that one!

**And that's exactly why I'm putting this call-out together.**

What do you remember about the Civic Hall? Did you attend a memorable concert, dance, performance or community event? Did you work there, meet someone special there or experience something that's stayed with you all these years? Perhaps you remember what the surrounding streets and shops looked like before the changes took place.

I'm planning to put together one of my historical stories about the Civic Hall, and **I'd love to include your memories and experiences as part of that research.** Old newspaper articles, archive records and photographs are fantastic for establishing the facts, dates and events, but there's something they can't always capture, and that's what it actually felt like to be there. Your memories add another level to the history, bringing warmth, personality and a human connection to a building that might otherwise be remembered simply through photographs and written records.

I want people reading the finished story to be able to imagine the sounds, the atmosphere, the excitement and the everyday life surrounding the Civic Hall during its different years. After all, history isn't just about when a building was constructed or what it was used for. It's about the people who walked through its doors, the conversations they had, the friendships they formed and those little moments that have stayed with them for a lifetime.

Even the smallest memory could help piece together a much bigger picture. Something you might think is completely insignificant could be the very detail that sparks a forgotten memory for somebody else.

So come on, Barrow, **let's get reminiscing!** Dig out those old photographs, have a rummage through your memories and share your stories in the comments. Whether it's something funny, heartwarming, surprising or simply an everyday memory of how the area used to look, I'd genuinely love to hear it.

Let's give this part of Barrow's history the attention it deserves and make sure the stories of those who remember it aren't lost to time. ❤️

**Furness Whisper – Keeping the memories of Furness alive, one story at a time.**

Nance: The Morecambe Bay Prawner That Refused to DisappearStanding beside Ulverston Canal today, it would be easy to wal...
03/10/2026

Nance: The Morecambe Bay Prawner That Refused to Disappear

Standing beside Ulverston Canal today, it would be easy to walk past Nance without realising just how much history is sitting quietly in front of you. The remains of the old fishing boat are no longer surrounded by the slap of seawater against timber, the creak of ropes under strain or the sharp smell of salt, wet nets and freshly caught shrimp. Instead, there is the softer sound of the canal, birds moving through the trees and footsteps passing along the towpath. Yet beneath those peaceful surroundings is the story of a working boat that survived more than a century of change, from the days when sail-powered fishing boats filled Morecambe Bay to a time when only a handful of these vessels remain.

Nance was a Morecambe Bay prawner, a traditional sailing fishing boat closely associated with what became known as the Lancashire nobby. These boats were not built simply because they looked attractive under sail. Every part of them had a purpose. Morecambe Bay is a difficult place to work, with enormous tides, shallow water, shifting channels and weather that can change quickly. Fishermen needed boats capable of coping with those conditions, pulling nets across the bay and then getting the catch back to shore as quickly as possible. Before refrigeration, speed really mattered. A slow journey home could mean the difference between selling a fresh catch and watching part of a day's work begin to spoil.

According to the interpretation panel beside Nance, she was built in 1917 by Crossfields of Arnside, one of the best-known boat-building families associated with Morecambe Bay prawners. Crossfields had been building boats at Arnside since the nineteenth century and became particularly well known for producing strong, fast fishing vessels suited to the shallow waters of the bay. Nance was approximately 34 feet long, 10 feet 4 inches across the beam and drew around five feet of water. She cost £125 to build, with another £20 required for her sails. In simple inflation terms, £125 in 1917 would be roughly £11,000 to £12,000 in today's money, while the £20 paid for her sails would be about £1,700 to £1,900 today. Altogether, the £145 cost of Nance and her sails would come to somewhere around £13,000 in modern purchasing power. It is only an approximate comparison because wages, timber, skilled labour and the cost of boatbuilding have changed enormously, but it gives a much better idea of what a serious investment Nance represented to a working fisherman.

There is, however, an interesting mystery surrounding her age. Some museum records have described Nance as dating from 1913 or 1914, while the information displayed alongside the surviving boat gives 1917. Until an original Crossfields construction ledger, vessel register or another contemporary source is located, the discrepancy cannot be completely resolved. For now, 1917 appears to be the strongest date attached directly to the vessel, but it is one of those historical puzzles that makes researching old boats so interesting. Somewhere, perhaps sitting quietly in an archive box or inside an old handwritten ledger, there may still be a single line that finally settles the argument.

Nance's first owner was Percy Baxter of Morecambe, and research into that name opens another fascinating part of the story. Parish records show a Percy Baxter baptised at Holy Trinity in Poulton-le-Sands, now part of Morecambe, on 28 December 1873. His parents were Henry and Mary Baxter, and Henry's occupation was recorded simply as fisherman. If this is the same Percy Baxter who later owned Nance, he grew up surrounded by the fishing culture of Morecambe Bay. He would have known the smell of tarred rope and wet timber, the sound of boats knocking gently together as the tide lifted them, and the sight of sails appearing on the horizon as fishermen made their way home.

Percy would have been in his early forties when Nance was built if the 1917 date is correct. By then he would have been an experienced man rather than a young fisherman buying his first boat. Commissioning a new Crossfields prawner would have represented a major commitment. These boats were working tools, but they were also something fishermen took enormous pride in. A good prawner had to earn her keep, survive difficult weather, work in shallow water and, preferably, be faster than the boat belonging to the fisherman moored alongside you.

Nance appears to have proved that she could certainly move. In 1920 she came first in the Half-deck Fishing Boat Handicap Race, with Percy Baxter still recorded as her owner. Fishing boat racing formed an important part of coastal life. These were the same boats that spent their working days dragging nets and carrying catches, but when regattas and local races were held, fishermen could test both their vessels and their sailing skills against one another. It is easy to imagine Nance under full sail on Morecambe Bay, her hull pressing hard through the water, canvas pulled tight by the wind and the crew watching every movement of the boats around them. For a working fisherman, winning was more than receiving a prize. It was proof that his boat could sail.

The term half-decker tells us more about Nance herself. These vessels were partly decked rather than completely enclosed, leaving fishermen enough open working space to handle their gear and catches. Their relatively low working areas made it easier to haul nets aboard, while the bow needed enough height and strength to cope with rougher water. It was a design shaped by generations of experience rather than appearance. Every curve, plank and frame existed because fishermen had learned what worked on Morecambe Bay and what did not.

Nance would have been used primarily for catching the pink and brown shrimps for which Morecambe became famous, although flatfish and other species could also find their way into the nets. Fishing in those days was cold, wet and physically demanding. Hands would become stiff from hauling soaked ropes. Clothing absorbed spray and rain. Boots moved across decks made slippery by seawater, mud and the contents of the nets. The smell of salt would have mixed with fish, damp timber, tarred rope and smoke. There was no heated wheelhouse to retreat into and no modern electronic navigation equipment telling the crew exactly where they were. Fishermen learned the shape of the coast, the movement of the tides and the constantly changing channels of the bay.

Then Nance's history becomes frustratingly quiet. After her victory in 1920, there is still a large gap in her known story. Nearly four decades pass before she clearly appears again in the surviving information. There must have been owners, fishing trips, storms, repairs and ordinary working days during those missing years, but their details have not yet surfaced. Boats such as Nance rarely lived gentle lives. Planks were replaced, sails wore out, rigging was renewed and engines were sometimes fitted as traditional sail fishing declined. Somewhere within those missing years is another large part of Nance's story still waiting to be uncovered.

By 1959, Nance belonged to Ted and Frank Gerrard. Their ownership gives us another glimpse of the very different life these vessels could provide. The Gerrards reportedly lived aboard Nance while fishing and travelled as far north as Maryport. Living aboard a 34-foot fishing boat would have been far removed from modern ideas of comfort. Space was limited, dampness would have worked its way into clothing, bedding and timber, and the smell of the day's catch would have followed the men below deck. On a calm evening there may have been little more than the soft knock of water against the hull, but poor weather would have transformed that same small space into something entirely different, with the boat rolling beneath them, ropes groaning and wind pressing against the rigging outside.

The journey north towards Maryport also shows that boats like Nance were not confined to one small part of Morecambe Bay. Similar Crossfields vessels worked all along the north-west coast, including Barrow, Fleetwood and the Cumbrian coast. Another Crossfields-built fishing boat called Christine was built around the same period and later worked from several of those ports. Nance belonged to a whole maritime network that has now almost completely disappeared from everyday life.

Eventually the years caught up with her. In 1978 Nance was hauled from Walney Channel by Joe Dowthwaite, together with members of his family and friends. It is difficult not to imagine that moment. After decades of fishing, sailing and exposure to salt water, the old boat was being pulled from the channel rather than heading out into it. Her working life was effectively over, but somebody had decided that she was worth saving.

Joe Dowthwaite spent around five years attempting to restore Nance as a hobby. Restoring an old wooden fishing boat is an enormous undertaking. Salt, rot and decades of movement work deep into timber. Frames weaken, metal fastenings corrode and planking loses its strength. What initially looks like a handful of damaged boards can quickly become the rebuilding of an entire section of hull. Nevertheless, Joe continued working on her until his death prevented the restoration from being completed.

In 1987, Mrs Dowthwaite donated Nance, together with her husband's boat-building workshop, to the Furness Maritime Trust. The Trust played an important role in preserving the maritime history of Furness and helped lay the foundations for what eventually became the Dock Museum in Barrow. Nance had now made the transition from working fishing boat to historic artefact. Instead of being valued for how many shrimp she could bring home, she was being valued for everything she represented.

When the Dock Museum opened in 1994, Nance became part of its maritime displays. For around twenty years visitors were able to stand beside a genuine survivor from Morecambe Bay's fishing industry. For some older visitors she may have brought back memories of a coastline filled with working boats. For younger visitors she offered a glimpse into a world that had almost disappeared completely.

Her survival was still far from guaranteed. In 2014 Nance was removed from display and later stored at Salthouse. Wooden boats do not stop deteriorating simply because their working lives have ended. Once exposed timber begins to decay, preserving a vessel of this age becomes increasingly difficult and expensive. By this point Nance had already survived close to a century.

Rather than allowing what remained of her to disappear completely, another rescue attempt began. The Ulverston Canal Regeneration Group became involved and obtained funding from the Sir John Fisher Foundation. The surviving skeleton of Nance was eventually reassembled by Siemens Energy apprentices, while the artwork surrounding her was created by CB Arts.

That brings us back to the remains beside Ulverston Canal today.

Walk around Nance and her size becomes much easier to understand. Her outer planking has largely disappeared, leaving the great curved wooden ribs of the hull exposed to the open air. They rise from the ground almost like the bones of an enormous animal, each one once hidden behind thick planking and constantly moving against the pressure of the sea. Long timbers still run through the frames, showing how the strength of the vessel was carried along her hull.

Sunlight now passes straight through spaces that would once have been dark inside the boat. Grass, brambles and young trees grow around her timbers, leaves brushing against wood that once sat surrounded by seawater. The smell of salt, tar, fish and wet rope has gone, replaced by damp earth, vegetation and ageing timber. Birds move through the trees where once there would have been gulls circling overhead, waiting for scraps from the catch.

Even in this stripped-back state, the shape of Nance is unmistakable.

The curve of the hull is still there. The ribs still show the breadth of the vessel and the amount of timber needed to hold her together while she worked the bay. Looking through the open framework, it becomes easier to imagine those spaces covered once again by planking, the deck above, ropes coiled nearby and fishermen moving around as the boat rolled beneath their feet.

The remains also make Nance feel less like a museum object and much more like what she really was: a working vessel.

These timbers were not made to sit quietly among trees. They were shaped to move through water. They once shook as sails filled with wind, flexed when Nance met waves and carried the weight of men, nets, equipment and catches. Every tide placed another strain upon them. Every winter brought more rain, salt and cold. Yet enough of those timbers survived for the shape of the boat still to be recognised more than a century later.

There is something fitting about Nance ending up beside the canal at Ulverston. She spent her working life connected to the waters of Morecambe Bay, eventually reached Walney Channel, became part of Barrow's maritime collection and now rests only a short distance from the coast that shaped her entire existence.

Today there are no fishermen standing aboard pulling wet nets over the side. There is no catch waiting to be sold, no sail cracking as the wind changes direction and no Percy Baxter trying to squeeze another fraction of speed from her during a race. Moss and weather have replaced salt spray, while footsteps along the canal have replaced the voices of fishermen calling across the deck.

But Nance is still here.

More than a century after she was built, after countless tides, changes of ownership, years of fishing, abandonment, restoration attempts, museum display and another period of deterioration, enough survived for her story to continue.

And perhaps that is the most important part of Nance's history.

She was never a grand passenger liner or famous naval vessel. She was a working boat. She belonged to ordinary fishermen earning their living from one of the most unpredictable stretches of water in Britain. Boats like Nance helped feed families, supported fishing businesses and once formed part of the everyday landscape of Morecambe Bay.

Thousands of people must once have watched vessels like her sailing home, their sails visible across the water long before the boats reached the shore.

Most of those boats are now gone.

Nance, somehow, refused to disappear.

A little update on the Furness Whisper carnival idea.I’ve started looking properly into what it would take to bring a ca...
25/09/2026

A little update on the Furness Whisper carnival idea.

I’ve started looking properly into what it would take to bring a carnival back to Furness, and I’ve now been given a quote of £25,000.

That figure covers the sort of things that have to be in place for a large public event, including road closures, traffic management, security, crowd control and all the other practical costs involved in making sure everything is organised properly and safely.

There would also need to be the correct public liability insurance, permissions and safety planning. I don’t want to cut corners with any of it. If we manage to pull this off, I want it done properly.

When I think about bringing a carnival back, I can picture the streets full again — music coming down the road, colourful costumes and banners, dancers and local groups taking part, children waving, families lining the route and that proper buzz you get when the whole community comes together for something special.

And if the backing is there, I’d want this to be something that involves everyone — local families, schools, clubs, dance groups, community organisations, businesses, performers and anyone else who wants to be part of it. The whole point would be to make it feel like a proper Furness community event.

So I want to ask everyone who follows Furness Whisper something.

If I set up a crowdfunding page or GoFundMe to help raise the £25,000 needed to bring a carnival back to Furness, would you be willing to support it?

I’m not asking anyone for money right now. At this stage, I simply want to see how many people would genuinely get behind the idea before I take it any further.

And hopefully this wouldn’t just be a one-off. If the first carnival was a big success and people really got behind it, I’d love to see it become a regular event, something Furness could look forward to year after year.

If we managed to raise more than the £25,000 target, the extra money would not go to waste. If there was enough support to make the carnival a regular event, any money left over could go towards organising the next one. If it did turn out to be a one-off, any remaining money would be donated to a fantastic local non-profit charity.

Even a few pounds from lots of people, alongside sponsorship, fundraising and support from local businesses and organisations, could make something pretty special possible.

So I’d really like to know what people think.

Would you support a crowdfunding campaign to help bring a proper carnival back to Furness?

And if you want to see this happen, please share this post with everyone you know and help spread the word. Share it with friends, family, local groups, clubs and businesses. The more people we can involve and the more backing we can show, the better chance we have of making it happen.

Has anyone got a good copy of the Furness Mystery Plays 1988 recording?The play was performed at Furness Abbey, with sce...
06/09/2026

Has anyone got a good copy of the Furness Mystery Plays 1988 recording?

The play was performed at Furness Abbey, with scenes from the Old and New Testaments and a cast of more than 200 people. According to the programme, the recording was made on 9 September 1988 and was sponsored by Barrow Borough Council.

I’ve recently been passed a copy of the recording, but unfortunately it is in very poor condition and doesn’t play properly.

If anyone has a good copy on DVD, video, or another format, or knows somebody who may still have one tucked away, please send me a message. I’d love to find a watchable copy and preserve it.

Please share this around — with such a large local cast involved, there must be a chance that another copy still survives somewhere!

The Legend of Marsh’s Sass: The Lost Fizz – Part Two ☕Before I dive back into Marsh’s Sass, there is something I want to...
05/09/2026

The Legend of Marsh’s Sass: The Lost Fizz – Part Two ☕

Before I dive back into Marsh’s Sass, there is something I want to mention first. Kevin Alexander has a book coming out called Marsh’s Soft Drinks: The History – Barrow-in-Furness. I have not seen or read the book yet, so the research and theories in this blog have come from my own digging around, old newspaper reports, records and the different trails I have been following.

When the book is published, I would encourage anyone interested in Marsh’s to get hold of a copy, just as I intend to. I am genuinely looking forward to seeing how what I have found compares with Kevin’s research, whether some of my theories turn out to be right or completely wrong, and especially what sources have been uncovered. That is part of what I enjoy about local history. None of us has every piece of the puzzle, and I would much rather find out I have followed a wrong trail and learn what really happened than keep repeating something simply because it sounded right.

When I first wrote about Marsh’s Sass back in March 2024, I knew there were still gaps in the story. What I did not expect was to still be digging into it nearly two years later, following one little clue into another until a bottle of Barrow pop had taken me through old newspapers, company records, food regulations and eventually halfway around the world into the old trade in sassafras oil.

That is usually how my research goes. I start looking for one answer and suddenly it is well past midnight, I have far too many tabs open and I am reading about a tree growing thousands of miles away wondering whether it might somehow help explain what happened to a fizzy drink once sold around Barrow.

And that is exactly where Marsh’s Sass has taken me.

For those who remember it, think back to those old glass bottles: the cap coming away, that first little hiss as the pressure escaped and the bubbles racing upwards through the dark drink. Sass was not just another bottle of pop sitting amongst the lemonade, cream soda and cherryade. It had its own smell and its own unmistakable taste, and judging by the amount of memories that still appear whenever I mention it, that flavour has stayed firmly lodged in people’s minds decades later.

One of the little finds that pulled me back into the story was hidden away on page five of the Barrow News on 28 September 1962. Amongst all the other adverts was one beautifully simple line: “YOU’LL ENJOY: MARSH’S SASS.” That was it. No long description and no need to explain what Sass was. The name itself was enough. I love little adverts like that because they give us a tiny glimpse back into everyday Barrow, with bottles clinking behind shop counters, crates being carried about and the familiar local pop already part of people’s lives.

Then, on 9 March 1971, Marsh’s Sass Limited was officially incorporated under company number 01004196. One of the little things I found while researching this that really caught my attention is that Marsh’s Sass Limited still exists today. The drink may have vanished from the shelves, the old bottles may now be collectors’ pieces and the days of the pop wagon rattling around the streets may have faded into memory, but the company itself is still there. It is almost like one little bubble of Sass never quite burst.

Following the business side of the story eventually took me into T. Brady & Sons. I have deliberately kept this part focused on the drink itself because it is the journey of Marsh’s Sass that I am interested in. In 1983, the different sides of the Brady business were separated, with the drinks side, including Marsh’s Sass, continuing under Bob Brady.

The next major change came in 1993, when Purity Soft Drinks took over production of Marsh’s Sass. Around the same time, the old Barrow factory closed, with it later being reported that bringing the plant up to modern standards would simply have cost too much. The name remained on the bottle and Sass continued making its way back into Furness, but the drink was no longer being made in the town where generations had known it.

You might assume that was the beginning of the end and that people had simply started drinking something else.

But that is where this story becomes much more interesting.

By 31 January 1999, Purity was still sending around 12,000 bottles of Marsh’s Sass every month into Barrow and the surrounding area. Twelve thousand bottles a month is a lot of caps being opened and a lot of glasses being filled. This was not some unwanted old drink gathering dust at the back of a shop. People were still buying Sass in serious numbers.

So if people were still drinking thousands of bottles every month, what happened?

Towards the end of 1998, Purity was beginning to run low on something needed to make Marsh’s Sass. It had a wonderfully mysterious name:

“No. 2 acid.”

As soon as I came across that, that was me gone down another rabbit hole. What was it? Why No. 2? Was there a No. 1? Was it actually one acid, or was that simply the name given to some sort of prepared flavouring mixture or concentrate?

Purity said they were running out and had asked the Marsh family for more, but were told there were problems producing it. The newspaper report also said that the rights to the top-secret No. 2 acid were retained by the Marsh family. From the way this was described at the time, we believe the Marsh family still hold those rights today.

Then came the sentence that really got me digging. Purity said that the problems producing No. 2 acid may have been connected with tougher food-safety regulations.

At first, I started looking at phosphoric acid, E338. It seemed an obvious place to start because phosphoric acid is used in soft drinks and, with the mysterious ingredient actually being called an “acid”, it looked like a possible lead. But there was a problem with that theory: phosphoric acid was not banned. European rules continued to allow E338 in non-alcoholic flavoured drinks at up to 700 milligrams per litre.

Then I found that on 15 October 1998, the EU adopted Directive 98/72/EC, changing some of the rules surrounding phosphates, including E338. The timing certainly caught my eye. October 1998, changes to the rules; late 1998, Purity running low on No. 2 acid and being told there were problems making more. It would be very easy to join those dots and announce that we had solved it, but E338 remained legal, so the simple explanation that phosphoric acid was banned and killed off Marsh’s Sass does not work.

That sent me looking elsewhere.

And that is where sassafras, safrole and isosafrole entered the story.

Sassafras is a tree native to North America whose roots and bark were historically used in drinks and flavourings. Oil made from sassafras became particularly well known for the distinctive flavour of traditional root b**r. If you have never tasted anything in that family, it is difficult to describe properly. Imagine something sweet and warming, but also herbal, spicy and slightly woody, with that old-fashioned medicinal edge you get from drinks such as sarsaparilla. It is not simply sweet like lemonade or fruity like orangeade; it has a deeper aroma and a flavour that hangs around.

Inside sassafras oil is a naturally occurring aromatic compound called safrole. Safrole is responsible for much of that familiar sassafras smell and flavour. Isosafrole is closely related to it and also has a strong aromatic character. Historically, this whole family of flavours sat very comfortably in the world of root b**r, sarsaparilla and other old-fashioned herbal soft drinks.

And then there is the rather obvious word sitting in front of us:

Sass.

I want to be very clear here because I do not want a theory of mine turning into a “fact” somewhere down the line. I have not found anything proving Marsh’s Sass contained sassafras, safrole or isosafrole. We do not have the secret recipe, and the similarity of the name alone proves absolutely nothing.

But when you combine the name, the distinctive sort of flavour people remember, a secret mixture called No. 2 acid and Purity saying tougher food-safety rules may have caused problems producing it, I think you can see why I started looking much more closely at sassafras.

And this is where what happened to that flavouring becomes particularly interesting.

Safrole had attracted serious food-safety concerns, and by the late twentieth century its use in food and drink was being tightly controlled. European rules meant safrole and isosafrole could no longer simply be added directly as flavourings, with only very small amounts naturally carried through from certain flavouring materials being permitted in ordinary drinks.

So unlike phosphoric acid, here we have a flavouring family where the rules really had become much tighter.

But regulations were only half of the story.

The supply of natural sassafras oil was also changing dramatically.

One of the world's major sources came from Brazil, where sassafras-type oil was produced from wild trees. For years huge quantities were exported, but those trees were being heavily depleted. Restrictions were placed on cutting them down, and the export trade collapsed. In 1986, Brazil exported around 1,582 tonnes of sassafras oil. By 1990, that had fallen to only around 280 tonnes.

Brazil had been the leading exporter until around 1991, but once restrictions on felling the wild trees came in, that huge traditional source of the oil effectively dried up.

That is one of the parts that really made me sit up and look at the dates again.

Brazil's supply collapses at the beginning of the 1990s.

Purity takes over production of Marsh’s Sass in 1993.

Then by late 1998, Purity is running low on No. 2 acid and is being told there are problems producing more.

China had also become a major supplier, while Vietnam began exporting sassafras oil around 1990, partly filling gaps left by shrinking supplies elsewhere. But these supplies also depended heavily on wild trees, and there were already concerns that they could not continue forever.

Again, none of this proves that Marsh’s Sass contained natural sassafras oil or safrole.

But I think it is far too interesting to ignore.

We have an old-fashioned soft drink with an unusual flavour. We have something secret called No. 2 acid. We have Purity saying there were problems producing it and suggesting tougher food-safety regulations may have been involved. At the same time, safrole and isosafrole were becoming increasingly restricted, while one of the great sources of natural sassafras oil had collapsed.

Could all of that be connected?

Possibly.

Could it also be a complete coincidence?

Absolutely.

That is why this remains a theory, not a conclusion.

The more I look at the words “No. 2 acid”, the less convinced I am that we should imagine one simple bottle of acid being tipped into a vat. It could have been a manufacturer's name for an entire mixture or flavouring concentrate.

Imagine an old works bench, measuring jugs and bottles lined up, the sweet herbal smell of flavouring hanging in the air as something was measured into a concentrate before being mixed into a full batch. Perhaps No. 2 acid arrived already prepared. Perhaps only a small number of people knew exactly what went into it. Perhaps the name meant something completely ordinary to the people making Sass and only sounds mysterious to us all these years later.

Could phosphoric acid have formed part of it? Possibly.

Could some sort of sassafras-style flavour have been another part? Possibly.

Could safrole or isosafrole have been involved somewhere in an older version of the recipe? Again, possibly.

But until we find something that actually tells us what No. 2 acid contained, we simply do not know.

What we do have is a fascinating collection of clues, and that is enough to keep me looking.

The figure that still keeps coming back to me is 12,000 bottles a month.

Imagine those crates arriving back in Barrow, bottles knocking against each other as they were unloaded, caps popping off in kitchens, shops and clubs around Furness and that familiar smell rising as the dark fizzy drink hit the glass.

This was happening in 1999.

People had not forgotten Marsh’s Sass. They had not suddenly stopped liking it. The demand was still there.

That is why I do not think the story is as simple as Sass getting old-fashioned and people moving on. Something seems to have happened behind the scenes. The drink was still selling, but one of the things needed to make it was running out and there were problems getting more.

That changes the ending completely.

When I wrote my first Marsh’s Sass blog, I wondered if the recipe might still be hiding somewhere in a forgotten notebook or tucked away in an old drawer.

After all this digging, I wonder that even more.

Perhaps somewhere there is an old works book with measurements scribbled in the margins. Maybe an invoice survives naming whoever supplied No. 2 acid. Perhaps there is an old label stuck to a bottle or drum, a factory sheet folded amongst paperwork or a handwritten note nobody has looked at for thirty years.

Or perhaps somebody simply remembers.

One former worker might see the words “No. 2 acid” and know exactly what I am talking about. Somebody might remember what container it arrived in, what colour it was, what it smelt like or where it came from. Even one tiny memory could send this whole investigation off in a completely new direction.

We now know far more than we did when I wrote Part One. We know Marsh’s Sass was still being sold in huge numbers towards the end. We know Purity was running short of No. 2 acid and had asked the Marsh family for more. We know they were told there were problems producing it, and Purity believed tougher food-safety rules may have had something to do with those problems.

We also know the simple phosphoric-acid explanation does not work because E338 remained legal.

And now we have another trail to follow: sassafras, safrole, isosafrole and what happened to the old international sassafras-oil trade.

Is that what was hiding somewhere inside No. 2 acid?

I genuinely do not know.

But I think it is one of the most interesting leads we have found so far.

So once again, I am throwing this one out to you lot. If you worked with Marsh’s Sass, bottled it, delivered it, sold it or remember somebody in your family who did, I would love to hear from you. If the words “No. 2 acid”, sassafras, safrole or isosafrole ring even the faintest bell, please get in touch.

Because somewhere out there, perhaps in somebody's memory, an old box of paperwork or a dusty bottle that has sat untouched for years, there may still be one final clue waiting for us.

And until we find it, the secret behind Marsh’s Sass continues to fizz away just out of reach.

Address

Barrow In Furness

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Furness Whisper posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Shortcuts

Share

Category