What are the opening hours?

Monday 11am - 5pm Tuesday 11am - 5pm Wednesday 11am - 5pm Thursday 11am - 5pm Friday 11am - 5pm Saturday 11am - 5pm

Ghosts of the Battlefield: War Machine, 1329 Harpers Road, Ste 103, Virginia Beach, VA (2026)

Name: Ghosts of the Battlefield: War Machine
Address: 1329 Harpers Road, Ste 103, Virginia Beach, VA, 23454, US
Telephone: (757) 301-8718
Price range: $

We are a family owned business that has a long and proud history having been in existence since 2001. We as a company have adapted our focus many times to suit market trends, needs of customers and the laws of the Commonwealth. Our storefront location has retail, a service center and a small museum. Currently we specialize in providing FFL transfers and storage, fi****ms and accessory sales, and o

ur pride and joy, the fi****ms coating and service department. The service department specializes in everything, from minor cleanings and repairs to depot level maintenance and restoration. With over 20 years of fi****ms experience we pride ourselves on our customer service and expertise in restoration of both military and sporting fi****ms. We offer a friendly; low stress, highly immersive environment that has no equal. Our goal is to educate on many different levels. Ghost Army is truly unique among stores.

08/28/2026

The M1941 Johnson R***e: The Semiautomatic R***e That Almost Had a Different War

By the time the United States entered World War II, the M1 Garand was already becoming one of the defining weapons of the American infantryman. Yet another American semiautomatic r***e was entering production at almost exactly the same moment, one with a larger magazine, an unusual recoil-operated action, and several features that made it particularly attractive to airborne troops.

It was the Model of 1941 Johnson R***e, designed by Marine Corps Reserve officer and Boston attorney Melvin Maynard Johnson Jr.

The Johnson is sometimes described as the r***e that “lost” to the M1 Garand, but that simplifies what actually happened. The Army had already standardized the Garand in 1936, while Johnson was still developing his design. His r***e underwent military evaluations later in the 1930s and early 1940s, but by then the Army had invested heavily in Garand production. The Marine Corps also evaluated the Johnson before formally adopting the M1 Garand in February 1941. The Johnson was therefore trying to displace a weapon already accepted, tooled for production, and increasingly available in large numbers.

Johnson took a very different mechanical approach from John Garand.

The M1 Garand was gas-operated. The Johnson used short-recoil operation. When the r***e fired, the barrel and locked bolt recoiled together for a short distance before unlocking and cycling the action. This eliminated the Garand's gas system, but it also meant that the barrel itself had to move freely. Adding too much weight to the barrel could interfere with the action, which is why Johnson had to design an extremely lightweight spike-type bayonet rather than simply attaching a conventional heavy bayonet.

The r***e was chambered for the same powerful .30-06 Springfield cartridge used by the Garand, Browning Automatic R***e, and several American machine guns. It weighed roughly 9½ pounds, placing it in essentially the same weight class as the M1.

Its most distinctive feature was the magazine.

Instead of the Garand's eight-round en bloc clip, the Johnson contained a 10-round rotary magazine built into the r***e. Am******on was loaded through a port in the side of the receiver. The system could be replenished with individual cartridges or st****er clips, and unlike the Garand's en bloc system, the r***e did not require the magazine to be emptied before am******on could conveniently be added. Marine Corps historical material specifically noted that the Johnson's rotary magazine could be loaded without opening the bolt.

That gave the Johnson an interesting practical advantage. A r***eman who had fired several rounds could replenish the magazine during a lull instead of waiting until the r***e was empty. The ten-round capacity also gave it two more cartridges than the Garand.

The r***e had another feature that would become important to the Marines: its barrel could be removed quickly. This allowed the r***e to be broken into a shorter package for transport, an attractive quality for troops expected to jump from aircraft with their equipment strapped to them.

Johnson's problem was finding a customer.

The U.S. Army showed little enthusiasm for replacing the Garand, so Johnson looked overseas. In August 1940, the Netherlands Purchasing Commission placed an initial order for 10,200 Johnson r***es and 515 Johnson light machine guns for Dutch colonial forces in the East Indies. A second r***e order brought the Dutch total to 20,400 r***es. Production was established at the Cranston Arms Company in Rhode Island.

Then Japan changed everything.

Only about 3,000 Johnson r***es had been shipped before the Japanese conquest of the Dutch East Indies made further delivery impossible. Most of the remaining Dutch-owned weapons were stranded in the United States. In total, 21,988 Model 1941 Johnson r***es were manufactured, including r***es produced beyond the Dutch contracts and approximately 1,000 chambered in 7x57mm for Chile.

Those stranded Dutch r***es soon attracted American attention.

The Marine Corps was organizing its experimental parachute battalions, the Paramarines. For them, the Johnson's removable barrel and semiautomatic firepower were particularly appealing. Melvin Johnson initially provided 23 r***es to the 1st Parachute Battalion before it departed for the Solomon Islands. These were not specially manufactured Marine Corps r***es. They were ordinary Model 1941 Johnsons originally produced under the Dutch program.

Those first r***es went into combat during the Guadalcanal campaign in 1942. Marine paratrooper Captain Harry Torgerson later recalled that they were used by selected scout-snipers. Johnson r***es were present during fighting around Tulagi, Gavutu, and Guadalcanal, giving the weapon the combat experience it had never received through formal Army adoption.

The Marines liked them enough to obtain more.

On October 7, 1942, 650 Model 1941 r***es were shipped to the Fleet Marine Force quartermaster in San Diego after the Dutch authorized their transfer. Marine documentation indicates that the Corps ultimately procured 750 Johnson r***es. Later tables of organization authorized roughly 242 to 243 of them for the newly formed 1st Parachute Regiment. The rest apparently remained unissued or in reserve.

This is also where a persistent collector myth needs to die a dignified death.

There was no special “USMC Model 1941 Johnson.” The r***es acquired by the Marines were standard Dutch-contract r***es. They received no unique Marine markings and were not drawn from a special serial-number block. Without documented provenance, simply owning a Johnson r***e does not prove that it served with the Marine Corps.

The Johnson saw its most substantial Marine use during operations in the Solomon Islands and Bougainville. After the Choiseul operation, Lieutenant Colonel Victor “Brute” Krulak evaluated the weapons used by his Paramarines. His conclusion regarding the Johnson was notably favorable: it had performed similarly to the M1, and he found little practical difference between them.

That is probably the fairest assessment of the r***e.

The Johnson was not obviously superior to the Garand, but neither was it an unsuccessful design.

Its ten-round magazine was flexible and could be topped off. Its removable barrel made transportation easier. Its recoil-operated system worked without a conventional gas mechanism, and Marines who actually carried it in combat generally regarded it well.

But the Garand had advantages that mattered enormously in wartime. It was already standardized, production was accelerating into the millions, training and maintenance systems had been established around it, and enormous quantities of spare parts, tools, clips, and accessories were entering the military supply chain.

The Johnson's moving barrel also complicated bayonet use and created a design characteristic absent from the Garand. Its manufacturing quality could vary, and nothing about its battlefield performance demonstrated such an overwhelming advantage that abandoning the Garand production system would have made sense.

The fate of the r***e was ultimately tied to the fate of the Paramarines themselves.

The Marine parachute units never conducted a combat parachute jump, and the 1st Parachute Regiment was disbanded in February 1944. Once its principal American user disappeared, the Marine Corps had little reason to maintain a separate supply system for a few hundred nonstandard r***es. The Corps directed that Johnson weapons be eliminated from its requirements, bringing their brief American military career to an end.

The M1941 Johnson occupies a strange place in American weapons history.

It was not a failed prototype. Nearly 22,000 were manufactured. It was not rejected because it was hopelessly unreliable. Marines carried it successfully in combat. And it was not truly defeated by the Garand in some dramatic winner-take-all wartime competition.

Its real problem was timing.

Melvin Johnson developed a capable semiautomatic r***e just as the United States had already committed itself to another very capable semiautomatic r***e and was preparing to manufacture that weapon by the millions.

For a few hundred Marine Paramarines fighting in the Pacific, however, history took a different path.

They went into combat carrying one of the rarest American-used r***es of World War II: ten rounds of .30-06 in a rotary magazine, powered by an unusual recoil system, in a r***e that came remarkably close to being far more important than it ultimately became.

***e ***e

08/27/2026

The Mark 14 Torpedo: The Weapon That Betrayed America's Submariners

When American submarines went to war against Japan in December 1941, their principal weapon was supposed to be one of the most advanced torpedoes the United States had ever produced.

Instead, the Mark 14 became one of the most notorious weapons failures in U.S. Navy history.

It ran beneath targets without hitting them. It exploded before reaching them. It struck Japanese ships with a solid metallic impact and simply failed to detonate. Worse, submarine commanders reporting these failures initially faced resistance from the very organization responsible for the weapon.

For nearly two years, American submariners were fighting not only the Japanese Navy but their own torpedoes.

Development of the Mark 14 had begun at the Naval Torpedo Station at Newport, Rhode Island, in 1930. The Navy wanted a replacement for the older Mark 10 and simultaneously developed the Mark 13 for aircraft, Mark 14 for submarines, and Mark 15 for surface ships. Limited Depression-era budgets encouraged designers to share technologies among them and keep expensive live-fire testing to a minimum. The Mark 14 was 21 inches in diameter and approximately 20 feet 6 inches long. Later versions could run at about 46 knots for 4,500 yards or approximately 31.5 knots for 9,000 yards.

The weapon also carried something considerably more sophisticated than a simple impact fuse. Its Mark 6 exploder incorporated both contact and magnetic influence functions. The theory behind the magnetic system was excellent. Instead of striking the side of a ship, a torpedo could pass beneath its keel, detect the ship's magnetic influence, and explode underneath it. An underwater explosion beneath the keel could cause catastrophic structural damage to a vessel.

There was just one rather important problem.

The Navy had never properly proven the complete weapon under realistic combat conditions.

Full warshot torpedoes were expensive and supplies were limited. Prewar testing relied heavily on exercise torpedoes rather than production weapons carrying actual warheads. The Naval Undersea Museum notes that testing of warshot Mark 14s against real targets was essentially nonexistent. The Navy entered World War II believing it possessed a thoroughly advanced submarine weapon when several serious defects had never been exposed.

The first problem was depth.

Submarine commanders began reporting that torpedoes apparently passed beneath ships they should have hit. Rear Admiral Charles Lockwood, after taking command of submarines in the Southwest Pacific in 1942, ordered actual tests in which torpedoes were fired through fishing nets at known distances and depths.

The results were difficult to argue with.

Warshot Mark 14s were running roughly 10 feet deeper than their settings. By the time the problem was conclusively demonstrated, Pacific submarines had already fired more than 800 torpedoes with deeply disappointing results. Corrections to the depth settings finally improved the situation.

Then fixing the depth problem exposed another defect.

The Mark 6 magnetic influence exploder was unreliable.

Instead of waiting until the torpedo passed beneath the target, some Mark 14s detonated prematurely. Submarine crews heard explosions and sometimes believed they had hit their targets, only to discover later that the torpedoes had exploded well short. In some cases the premature detonation occurred as much as 50 feet from the ship.

Submarine commanders increasingly demanded permission to disable the magnetic feature and rely upon direct-contact detonation. Resistance continued for months. Rear Admiral Lockwood eventually used both patrol reports and intercepted Japanese communications documenting premature explosions to make his case. Admiral Chester Nimitz authorized deactivation of the magnetic feature in Pacific Fleet submarines on June 24, 1943.

At last, the submarine force had eliminated the depth problem and the premature explosions.

And then they discovered the torpedo still did not work.

With the magnetic feature disabled, crews increasingly saw Mark 14s strike Japanese ships without exploding. The contact exploder itself was defective.

One of the most important episodes came aboard USS Tinosa in July 1943. Lieutenant Commander Lawrence R. Daspit attacked the large Japanese tanker Tonan Maru No. 3. Tinosa scored hits, but repeated torpedoes failed to finish the crippled ship. Daspit eventually returned from patrol with evidence so compelling that the contact exploder could no longer be casually blamed on poor shooting or bad luck. The Navy's official history specifically records Tinosa's second patrol as being handicapped by the faulty Mark 14 firing mechanism.

Further testing produced an almost absurd discovery.

A perfect hit could be worse than an imperfect one.

When a Mark 14 struck a target nearly square-on at high speed, the violent deceleration could cause components of the contact mechanism to bind, preventing the firing pin from functioning properly. An angled or glancing impact was actually more likely to detonate the warhead.

In other words, the better the shot, the greater the possibility that the torpedo would become an extremely expensive underwater battering ram.

Tests involving torpedo warheads dropped against steel plates and torpedoes fired against cliffs confirmed the problem. Engineers developed corrections involving a lighter firing pin and a stronger spring. By the fall of 1943, the major exploder problems had finally been corrected, and by early 1944 the Mark 14 had become a dependable combat weapon.

There was another dangerous characteristic as well. Mark 14s could occasionally suffer circular runs, potentially sending the torpedo back toward the submarine that fired it. It is important, however, not to repeat one common piece of Mark 14 mythology: USS Tang was sunk by one of her own torpedoes in October 1944, but that weapon was a Mark 18 electric torpedo, not a Mark 14. USS Tullibee was also probably lost to a circular-running torpedo, but the exact torpedo type is uncertain.

Once its defects were corrected, the Mark 14 finally became the weapon American submariners had been promised.

Approximately 13,000 were manufactured during World War II. The majority were Mark 14 Mod 3 weapons, and later wartime versions could carry a 600-pound Torpex explosive charge. American submarines used Mark 14s throughout the Pacific campaign against tankers, freighters, transports, warships, and the merchant vessels sustaining Japan's far-flung empire.

The results after the corrections were devastating.

Naval History and Heritage Command credits the Mark 14 with sinking more than four million tons of Japanese shipping during World War II. American submarines ultimately strangled Japan's maritime supply system, destroying merchant shipping carrying oil, raw materials, troops, am******on, and food between Japan and its occupied territories.

The tragedy is how much more damage might have been done earlier.

American submariners entered the war facing enormous risks. To attack, they often had to pe*****te Japanese es**rts, calculate a firing solution, approach within torpedo range, expose a periscope, launch, and then survive the depth-charge attack that frequently followed.

They could do everything correctly and still watch their torpedoes fail.

The Mark 14's early history was therefore more than an engineering failure. It was a failure of realistic testing and institutional response. Several different defects had hidden behind one another, and reports from the men actually firing the weapon were too often treated as evidence of poor tactics or poor shooting rather than evidence that the weapon itself might be defective.

Once those problems were confronted, the same torpedo went from notorious failure to devastating success. Modified Mark 14s survived long after World War II, with later Mark 14 Mod 5 weapons remaining in submarine service until the arrival of the Mark 48 era in the 1970s.

Few weapons illustrate the difference between a brilliant design on paper and a reliable weapon in combat quite as clearly.

The Mark 14 eventually became one of the most destructive weapons carried by American submarines.

But first, the sailors using it had to prove to their own Navy that it was broken.

08/22/2026

The M163 Vulcan Air Defense System: Six Barrels on an M113

The M163 Vulcan Air Defense System, or VADS, was created to solve a simple Cold War problem: American mechanized forces needed an antiaircraft weapon fast enough to move with tanks and armored personnel carriers and powerful enough to engage enemy aircraft appearing suddenly at low altitude.

The Army's solution was wonderfully unsubtle. Take the proven M113 armored personnel carrier, modify it, and place a six-barreled 20mm Vulcan cannon on top.

The M163 emerged during the 1960s after cancellation of the ambitious Mauler missile program left the Army searching for short-range air defense. The service adopted two complementary systems: the MIM-72 Chaparral, using Sidewinder-derived missiles for somewhat longer-range engagements, and the Vulcan for aircraft that pe*****ted closer to friendly forces. Production systems began reaching the Army in the late 1960s.

The M163 used the M741 carrier, derived from the M113A1. Its aluminum hull, tracks, diesel engine, and amphibious capability allowed it to accompany mechanized formations across terrain that ordinary wheeled antiaircraft guns could not easily negotiate. A combat-loaded vehicle weighed roughly 27,000 pounds and normally carried a crew of four: commander, gunner, loader, and driver.

Its reason for existing, however, sat in the open turret.

The M168 20mm cannon was an Army adaptation of the M61 Vulcan aircraft gun. Six barrels rotated around a common axis, allowing the weapon to maintain an extraordinary rate of fire without forcing a single barrel to absorb all of the heat. The M163 could fire at approximately 1,000 or 3,000 rounds per minute, depending upon the selected mode. Rather sensibly, crews normally fired controlled bursts rather than attempting to convert the entire am******on load into noise in one sitting.

The M163 did have radar, but not the kind sometimes imagined.

Its AN/VPS-2 was a range-only radar. It helped determine distance and range rate after the gunner had visually acquired a target, but it was not a full search-and-track radar capable of independently sweeping the sky and automatically locking onto aircraft. Wider warning was supposed to come from systems such as the Forward Area Alerting Radar, which passed information to Chaparral and Vulcan crews.

That limitation was significant. A fast jet could cover enormous distance during the few seconds available to detect, identify, track, and fire. The M163's effective antiaircraft envelope was only around 1.5 to 1.6 kilometers, making it very much a last-ditch weapon against aircraft that had already reached the forward battle area.

Then came Vietnam, where the Vulcan discovered an entirely different career.

A provisional Vulcan combat team was sent to South Vietnam in late 1968 for operational evaluation. The problem was that North Vietnamese aircraft were not attacking American ground formations there, leaving very little opportunity to test the system against the targets it had been designed to destroy.

American soldiers did what soldiers have always done when handed a weapon that fires several thousand rounds per minute.

They pointed it at the ground.

National Archives photographs from 1969 show M163s of the 1st Vulcan Combat Team firing against Viet Cong bunkers and moving on search-and-destroy operations during the combat evaluation. Rather than waiting for MiGs that never appeared, the Vulcans were used against enemy positions, along roads, and in support of ground forces.

Here the M163 became frighteningly effective.

Twenty-millimeter cannon fire could tear through vegetation, light structures, firing positions, trucks, and other lightly protected targets. The high rate of fire also made the weapon exceptionally valuable during an ambush because a Vulcan crew could saturate a suspected position almost immediately.

One documented Vietnam action occurred near Firebase Thunder III on Highway 13. A column consisting of armored cavalry vehicles and a Vulcan was ambushed by a large North Vietnamese force. Several ACAVs were struck almost immediately. The Vulcan maneuvered around the damaged vehicles and opened fire, initially using a 30-round burst and then shorter 10-round bursts to conserve am******on. An Air Defense Artillery historical account credits the Vulcan with providing the column's most effective immediate return fire during the opening phase of the ambush.

That firepower came at a price.

The M163 carried only light aluminum armor. It could protect the crew from small arms and fragments but was never designed to trade shots with tanks, antitank guns, or RPG teams. The gunner was especially exposed in the turret. In Vietnam, one M163 from the provisional combat team was photographed after a Viet Cong mortar round damaged its Vulcan mounting, a useful reminder that tremendous firepower did not make the vehicle invulnerable.

Am******on consumption was another obvious problem. Thousands of rounds per minute sounds magnificent until someone remembers that every one of those rounds has to be carried, loaded, transported, and paid for. Controlled bursts were therefore essential both for conserving am******on and preventing unnecessary barrel heating.

The M163 continued serving after Vietnam and underwent improvements. The M163A1 incorporated reliability and maintainability modifications, while the later Product Improved Vulcan Air Defense System, commonly called PIVADS, improved the fire-control equipment. The Army kept the Vulcan longer than originally planned after the replacement M247 Sergeant York air-defense gun program collapsed in 1985.

By then, however, the Vulcan's limitations against modern aircraft were impossible to ignore. Attack helicopters could launch guided missiles from beyond its effective range, while fast jets increasingly employed stand-off weapons and sophisticated countermeasures. Systems such as the Stinger and later Avenger offered engagement opportunities at distances where the M163's cannon could do little.

The U.S. Army finally retired the Vulcan during the 1990s, with Avenger and other systems assuming its short-range air-defense role.

The M163 was therefore never the perfect antiaircraft weapon. Its range was short, its radar capability limited, and its lightly armored carrier left the crew vulnerable.

But those shortcomings tell only half of its story.

The Army built the M163 to protect armored formations from aircraft. Vietnam showed that six barrels of 20mm fire could be equally useful when the threat was hiding in a bunker, tree line, or roadside ambush position.

It was essentially an M113 carrying a cannon descended from those mounted in jet fighters.

Against aircraft, it was the last line of defense.

Against targets on the ground, 3,000 rounds per minute made for a remarkably persuasive argument.

08/20/2026

The Zippo Monitor: Flamethrower Gunboat of the Mekong Delta

The rivers and canals of South Vietnam created a battlefield where the enemy could be only a few yards away and completely invisible. Dense vegetation crowded the banks, while bunkers dug into the mud provided firing positions for machine guns, recoilless r***es, and rocket-propelled gr***des. For the sailors of America's Mobile Riverine Force, moving down a narrow waterway could mean sailing directly through a prepared ambush.

The U.S. Navy responded by creating some of the strangest armored fighting vessels of the Vietnam War. Among them was the Flamethrower Monitor, inevitably nicknamed the “Zippo.”

The Zippo began with the Navy's Vietnam-era river monitor, itself a radical conversion of the LCM-6 Landing Craft Mechanized. Instead of carrying vehicles onto a beach, the old landing-craft design was transformed into an armored river gunboat. The bow ramp disappeared, armor was added around the hull and superstructure, protective bar armor helped defeat shaped-charge weapons, and additional flotation protected the vessel against underwater explosions. Standard monitors carried an extraordinary collection of weapons, including a 40mm cannon, 20mm cannon, machine guns, gr***de launchers, and an 81mm mortar. They were essentially the floating heavy-support weapons of the Mobile Riverine Force.

But even the heavily armed monitor encountered a problem.

Viet Cong forces constructed bunkers along the riverbanks that could survive conventional gunfire surprisingly well. A 40mm cannon could batter a position, but thick earth, timber, and mud absorbed tremendous punishment. What the riverine force needed was a weapon capable of reaching into bunkers, trenches, and concealed positions where ordinary projectiles were having difficulty finishing the job.

Experiments began with flamethrowers aboard river craft. During 1967, an Army M132A1 armored flamethrower was placed aboard an Armored Troop Carrier for operational testing. The combination demonstrated that flame could be extremely effective against bunkers and ambush positions, but carrying an entire armored vehicle aboard another armored vehicle was hardly an elegant long-term solution. The Navy therefore developed a purpose-built flamethrower version of the Monitor.

The resulting craft replaced the standard Monitor's main bow gun arrangement with two M10-8 flamethrower systems mounted in armored cupolas. Naval History and Heritage Command photographs taken at Long Beach Naval Shipyard in 1968 clearly document the twin flame installations and identify the vessel as an LCM Monitor, Flamethrower Type, or “Zippo.”

The M10-8 was the same basic flamethrower system used in the Army's M132 armored flamethrower. Instead of a small portable tank carried on a man's back, the system used large fuel and pressure equipment to throw thickened burning fuel substantial distances. Contemporary descriptions of the riverine installation credit the twin projectors with ranges of roughly 200 to 300 yards under favorable conditions, giving the boat considerably more reach than an infantry flamethrower.

The result was visually spectacular and psychologically horrifying.

A Zippo could move along a riverbank and sweep flame across vegetation, bunker entrances, trenches, and suspected ambush positions. Thickened fuel clung to surfaces rather than simply burning away instantly. Even when the flame did not strike troops directly, the heat, smoke, destruction of vegetation, and threat of another burst could force defenders from positions that had resisted conventional fire.

The weapon was particularly suited to the strange geometry of river warfare. A boat could not maneuver across the battlefield like a tank. It was confined to the water and often had little choice about where it passed. Enemy troops knew that and established ambush positions overlooking predictable routes. The Zippo attempted to turn that disadvantage around by giving the river force the ability to attack the riverbank itself.

The Flamethrower Monitor was still far more than a floating fuel tank. It retained other weapons for close defense and operated with the armored protection developed for the Monitor family. The standard river monitor displaced roughly 76 tons fully loaded, measured about 61 feet long, and used twin diesel engines for a top speed of around eight knots. Its armor included steel plate, polyurethane protection, and external hardened-steel bars intended to interfere with shaped-charge rockets.

That protection mattered because the Zippo's job frequently brought it frighteningly close to the enemy.

Riverine crews faced automatic weapons, mines, recoilless r***es, and the ubiquitous B-40 rocket-propelled gr***de. On March 30, 1969, for example, official Navy reporting recorded Viet Cong forces attacking an Armored Troop Carrier and a flame Zippo monitor on the Vam Co Tay River with B-40 rockets and automatic weapons. The incident demonstrates that these boats were not simply burning vegetation from a safe distance. They were operating inside the same ambush zones they were intended to suppress.

The nickname “Zippo,” taken from the famous cigarette lighter, was almost inevitable. American troops had already used the name for flamethrower-equipped armored vehicles, including the M132 and Marine Corps M67 flamethrower tank. Applied to a riverboat capable of projecting twin streams of burning fuel, the name needed very little explanation.

The specialized monitors were comparatively rare. Twenty-four river monitors were produced in the major Vietnam conversion programs, with eight ultimately converted into flamethrower variants, according to a detailed history of the Navy's river monitors. Other later monitors received 105mm howitzers, producing yet another floating fire-support variation.

That small number reflected the Zippo's specialized mission. It was not intended to replace conventional monitors, Armored Troop Carriers, or Assault Support Patrol Boats. River assault formations combined different craft because each solved a different battlefield problem. ATCs delivered Army infantry. ASPBs provided fast es**rt and minesweeping capability. Conventional monitors supplied cannon, mortar, and machine-gun fire. The Zippo was brought forward when flame offered the best method of dealing with a particularly stubborn position or dangerous stretch of riverbank.

Flamethrower Monitors remained active as the river war continued into 1969. Navy operational summaries record Zippos accompanying other assault craft on missions and responding to combat situations on the rivers. As American participation in the riverine war began to wind down, the Navy transferred much of its river assault equipment to the Republic of Vietnam Navy as part of the broader Vietnamization program. The Monitor force was among the equipment passed to South Vietnamese control.

The Zippo Monitor belonged to a brief period when the United States Navy essentially reinvented the armored river gunboat for twentieth-century warfare.

It began with a World War II landing craft, then added armor, machine guns, cannon, radar, communications equipment, anti-RPG protection, and finally a pair of flamethrowers.

The result was neither a traditional warship nor simply an armored vehicle that happened to float.

It was a riverine assault weapon built specifically for a battlefield where the shoreline could become the front line without warning.

When Viet Cong bunkers disappeared beneath mud and vegetation and ordinary gunfire could not easily reach them, the Zippo had another solution.

It brought the fire directly to the riverbank.

Address

1329 Harpers Road, Ste 103
Virginia Beach, VA
23454

Opening Hours

Monday	11am - 5pm
Tuesday	11am - 5pm
Wednesday	11am - 5pm
Thursday	11am - 5pm
Friday	11am - 5pm
Saturday	11am - 5pm

Telephone

(757) 301-8718

Website

http://www.ghostsofthebattlefield.org/

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Ghosts of the Battlefield: War Machine posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Museum

Send a message to Ghosts of the Battlefield: War Machine:

Ghosts of the Battlefield: War Machine