04/25/2026
Explaining the robust Spanish Mexican genealogical roots in the U.S. has always been tough. The biggest obstacle standing in our way is that most people don't realize that Texas and the Southwest are in Spanish-speaking New Spain and not in English-speaking New England.
In other words, Texas and the Southwestern states aren’t part of the Northeast 13 English Colonies. Even before 1776, New Mexico, Texas, and California were already “states”.
Plus, the rest of the territory farther north was already settled along the Pacific Coast and inland. Thus, when the U.S. forcefully subsumed Northern Mexico in 1848, they simply took over already-settled Native American &Mexican land. In short, there’s no Plymouth Rock off the Texas coast.
A few days ago, you read about how the Gadsden Purchase blurred what was supposed to be a win-win border solution for both nations. Today, we’re covering another piece of the often-contentious U.S. & Mexico relationship puzzle.
That is, the origins of the Apr 25, 1846-Feb 2, 1848, U.S. Mexico War. Learning the real reason may present itself as an inconvenient truth for most people in this country. Still, there’s an old saying that goes “Truth is stranger than fiction”, and so it is with how the U.S. “Won the West.” So, knowing the cause-and-effect of the war will hopefully help un-tie that knotty issue.
(Hint. The “West” (Old West) is really conquered Native American/Mexican land. Alas, that key fact is masked in official U.S. history by the Homestead Act, Horace Greeley’s “Go West young man”, and largely influenced by Hollywood movies and TV programs, such as, “Wagon Train”, “Little House on the Prairie”, and “How the West was Won”, to name just a few.)
Moreover, during Pres. Polk’s saber-rattling bluster leading up to the war, a group of U.S. leaders fully recognized it as a blatant land-grab deception. Thus, they refused to violate Mexico’s sovereignty, a concept that at that time was sacred. They heavily debated the topic in Congress.
Besides U.S. Army General U.S. Grant’s contrite comments after the war (see slide), a young U.S. Congressman from Illinois, Abraham Lincoln, expressed similar moral concerns before the war.
For some time, expansionist President James K. Polk had “stoked the embers of war” to incite his jingoist base against Mexico. Without proof, he announced that U.S. soldiers had been killed by Mexican troops on U.S. soil. While not waving the bloody shirt himself, he fueled his pro-war supporters with his inflammatory oratory, seeking Congressional war funding.
Still, Abe Lincoln wasn’t having it. He thought that President Polk’s accusations lacked credibility. During a speech from the house floor, he dared Polk by demanding that he share with the Congress the details of the soldiers’ death and the exact spot on U.S. territory of the alleged killings. Polk refused to accept Lincoln’s challenge.
The reason is that Pres. Polk knew that the die was cast, so he didn’t care to answer. War with Mexico was approved, won, and allowed the U.S. to spread its wings from sea to shining sea.
In summary, Polk’s pre-planned ploy ended up occupying Northern Mexico (over half of Mexico’s sovereign territory).
Worse, Polk’s trick wasn’t forgotten, since it has served as a model for several wars since then. At least three examples come to mind, “Remember the Maine”, “The Gulf of Tonkin” incident, and “Weapons of Mass Destruction”, all propelled by and designed to spread fear rather than reality among supporters.
“Who lies for you will lie against you.” (John Locke).