06/19/2026
Happy ! As we celebrate the end of slavery in the United States that occurred in 1865, it’s important to remember that enslaved people and their allies had been fighting for freedom in various ways since the institution of slavery was established in North America over two centuries prior. Here’s what that looked like in the 17th century colony of New Netherland, among some of the first African people enslaved in North
On February 25th, 1644, eleven enslaved men successfully petitioned the Council of New Netherland for their freedom and the freedom of their wives. Their names were Paulo Angola, Manuel Groot, Cleyn Manuel, Manuel de Gerrit de Reux, Simon Congo, Anthony Portugues, Gracia d’Angola, Pieter Santome, Jan Francisco, Little Anthony, and Jan Fort Orange.
They had been some of the first enslaved people in New Netherland, who had arrived in 1627. According to these men, the Dutch West India Company had told them that their enslavement was to be temporary and that they were promised freedom after their term of service was finished; after nearly two decades, they were successful in holding the company to that promise.
But their newfound “freedom” wasn’t fully free. The status that New Netherland Director Willem Kieft ascribed to these individuals was later known as Half-Freedom, a form of conditional freedom unique to New Netherland.
Half-Free individuals were required to make an annual payment to the Dutch West India Company, consisting of crops grown and livestock raised on tracts of land designated to them north of New Amsterdam. They were also still obligated to provide labor to the Dutch West India Company whenever requested (though this was “on condition of receiving fair wages from the Company”). If the individuals failed to meet these requirements, the company would re-enslave them.
Kieft’s manumission listed the names of the men it freed, but not the names of their wives. Thus the women’s freedom depended on their marriage status; if they were suddenly widowed, they might be re-enslaved.
Finally, the manumission specifically stated that the children of these families were not granted freedom. Not only was this true for “many children” these couples already had, but those “yet to be born” were also to “remain bound and obligated to serve the [Company] as slaves.”
It’s important to remember that Director Kieft’s decision to grant Half-Freedom to these families was not for their benefit as much as it played a part in his military and economic strategies for New Netherlands as a whole. Freeing this aging contingent of enslaved workers meant that they now had to provide for themselves in terms of food, clothing, and medical care, thereby reducing costs for the Company. Around this time Kieft also began granting tracts of farmland to Black men and women but chose a specific area for them North of New Amsterdam. This meant the Black settlers would provide a human buffer zone between the Dutch settlement and the Lenape Native Americans, with whom Kieft had recently begun a deadly war. In this way Kieft was seeing to the interests of the New Netherland colony- always on the backs of and at the expense of Black men and women.
đź“· Manumission of Manuel de Gerrit and 10 other Negroes, February 25th, 1644, via New York State Archives