History of the world

History of the world Your Daily Dose Of History 👊

For 131 years, the severed head of a murdered Victorian widow was missing. Then builders working on David Attenborough’s...
08/30/2026

For 131 years, the severed head of a murdered Victorian widow was missing. Then builders working on David Attenborough’s property uncovered a human skull—and reopened one of London’s most gruesome murder stories.

In October 2010, construction workers digging on property connected to naturalist Sir David Attenborough’s home in Richmond, southwest London, made a discovery no one expected.

Buried beneath the ground was a human skull.

The remains appeared old, and their location immediately raised suspicions that they might belong to a woman whose murder had horrified Victorian Britain more than a century earlier.

Her name was Julia Martha Thomas.

Thomas was a 55-year-old widow living at 2 Mayfield Cottages in Richmond in 1879. Earlier that year, she had hired an Irish domestic servant named Kate Webster, a woman who already had a criminal history involving theft.

The relationship quickly deteriorated. Thomas became increasingly unhappy with Webster’s behavior and eventually dismissed her.

But Webster persuaded her employer to allow her to remain for several more days.

On March 2, 1879, an argument erupted between them.

According to Webster’s later confession, she attacked Thomas, knocked her down and strangled her to prevent her from screaming.

What happened afterward turned the killing into one of the most notorious crimes of Victorian England.

Webster dismembered Thomas’s body and attempted to destroy or conceal the evidence. Contemporary accounts and later investigations established that portions of the remains were boiled in a household laundry copper, while other pieces were packed into containers for disposal.

A box containing human remains was later recovered near the River Thames.

One of Thomas’s feet was also found separately.

But her head was nowhere to be found.

Without it, investigators at the time were missing one of the most important pieces of physical evidence in the case.

Meanwhile, Webster attempted something extraordinary.

For a short period after the murder, she reportedly assumed aspects of her dead employer’s identity, wearing Thomas’s clothing and dealing with people as though she now controlled the woman’s property.

Eventually suspicion closed in.

Webster fled to Ireland but was captured and returned to England. She was tried for Julia Martha Thomas’s murder, convicted and sentenced to death.

On July 29, 1879, Kate Webster was executed at Wandsworth Prison.

But one mystery survived her.

Where was Julia’s head?

For generation after generation, no one knew.

Then, 131 years later, builders began excavating behind property associated with David Attenborough in Richmond.

The skull they discovered was located on the former site of stables belonging to the Hole in the Wall pub, only a short distance from where Thomas had been murdered. Attenborough had purchased the neighboring former pub property for redevelopment.

Investigators began comparing the skull with historical records.

Radiocarbon dating placed it within a period compatible with Julia’s death. Its location matched historical accounts of where Webster may have disposed of the missing head.

The skull also contained injuries consistent with the known circumstances of the murder.

Investigators additionally found unusually low collagen levels, a finding considered consistent with the remains having been exposed to boiling—matching what was known about Webster’s attempts to dispose of Thomas’s body.

DNA could not provide the final answer because suitable relatives of Thomas could not be located.

Instead, police combined forensic examination, radiocarbon dating, census information, historical documents and the precise location of the discovery.

In July 2011, West London coroner Alison Thompson concluded that the skull belonged to Julia Martha Thomas.

The cause of death was recorded as asphyxiation and head injury.

After more than a century, the missing head from the famous “Barnes Mystery” had finally been found.

One particularly gruesome part of the story requires caution.

Modern retellings frequently claim that Webster rendered fat from Thomas’s remains and gave it to local or street children as “pig’s lard.”

That allegation appeared in accounts of the case and was repeated during the modern inquest. However, historians have noted that the claim was never firmly proved at Webster’s original trial and may have become exaggerated as the already horrific murder passed into Victorian crime legend.

The confirmed facts are disturbing enough.

A Victorian widow was murdered inside her own home.

Her body was dismembered and partially boiled.

Parts of her remains were scattered and dumped.

Her killer attempted to take over aspects of her life before fleeing.

And her severed head remained hidden beneath Richmond soil for more than 130 years.

Then an ordinary building project connected to the home of one of Britain’s most famous naturalists unexpectedly brought the final missing piece of the case back into the light.

Kate Webster had been convicted in 1879.

But it took until 2011 for Julia Martha Thomas’s missing skull to finally have its name restored.

Albert Einstein revolutionized our understanding of the universe—but his private life was far more complicated. While st...
08/29/2026

Albert Einstein revolutionized our understanding of the universe—but his private life was far more complicated. While still married, he began a relationship with his cousin Elsa, who would become his second wife and remain beside him despite his numerous affairs.

Albert Einstein is remembered as one of history’s greatest scientific minds, but behind the equations, Nobel Prize and iconic photographs was a complicated personal life marked by strained marriages, affairs and unconventional views about fidelity.

Einstein married Serbian physicist and mathematician Mileva Marić in 1903 after the two had met as students in Zürich. They had two sons together, Hans Albert and Eduard, but their marriage gradually deteriorated as Einstein’s career accelerated and the couple grew increasingly distant.

By 1912, while still married to Mileva, Einstein had begun a romantic relationship with Elsa Löwenthal.

Elsa was not a stranger.

She was Einstein’s cousin twice over. Their mothers were sisters, making Albert and Elsa first cousins on their mothers’ side. Their fathers were also first cousins, making them second cousins through their fathers. They had known each other since childhood.

Elsa had previously married textile merchant Max Löwenthal and had two surviving daughters, Ilse and Margot. She divorced him in 1908 and returned to using her maiden name, Einstein.

Albert’s relationship with Elsa began while Mileva was still his wife. Correspondence preserved in the Einstein archives shows that the two were romantically involved by 1912. When Einstein accepted a prestigious position in Berlin in 1914, Elsa was already an important part of his personal life.

That same year, Albert and Mileva effectively separated.

Their marriage had become bitter. At one point Einstein presented Mileva with an extraordinary list of conditions under which he would continue living with her, including expectations concerning meals, household duties and emotional distance.

Mileva eventually returned to ZĂĽrich with their sons.

The couple formally divorced on February 14, 1919. As part of their settlement, Einstein promised Mileva the money from a future Nobel Prize if he ever received one. When he later won the 1921 Nobel Prize in Physics, the prize money went to her under that agreement.

Only a few months after the divorce, Einstein married Elsa in June 1919.

Their relationship initially provided Einstein with a type of domestic stability he had lacked during the final years of his first marriage. When he suffered serious health problems in 1917, Elsa had helped nurse him back to health. She later became his travel companion, household manager and increasingly the person who dealt with the enormous public attention surrounding the world-famous physicist.

But marriage did not make Einstein monogamous.

Letters released decades later revealed that he maintained relationships with several other women while married to Elsa. Among the women mentioned in his correspondence were his secretary Betty Neumann and others identified by names including Margarete, Estella, Toni and Ethel.

Perhaps most remarkably, Einstein did not always conceal these relationships from his wife.

Correspondence indicates that Elsa knew about at least some of his romantic involvements. Einstein sometimes discussed other women directly in letters to her, and their extended family was aware that his relationships could extend beyond conventional marital boundaries.

Yet Elsa remained with him.

She accompanied Einstein on international journeys and helped manage the practical side of a life transformed by global celebrity. Following the confirmation of general relativity during the 1919 solar eclipse, Einstein became one of the most famous scientists on Earth. Wherever he traveled, journalists, academics and admirers followed.

Elsa often stood beside him through it all.

Einstein himself appears to have understood that conventional lifelong monogamy was something he struggled to maintain.

Years after Elsa’s death, he wrote a revealing letter in 1953 to a woman distressed by her husband’s infidelity. Einstein argued that many people were not naturally monogamous and wrote that “enforced faithfulness” was a bitter experience for everyone concerned.

The remark is sometimes presented as something Einstein said specifically about his marriage to Elsa, but that is not accurate. He wrote it nearly 17 years after her death while giving relationship advice to someone else.

Even more revealing was Einstein’s later reflection on his own marriages. Writing about a friend who had remained with one woman throughout his life, Einstein admitted that maintaining such a stable relationship was something at which he had “grossly failed, twice.”

Despite the affairs and complications, Albert and Elsa remained married as political events in Germany dramatically transformed their lives.

When Adolf Hi**er and the N**i Party came to power in 1933, Einstein—Jewish, internationally famous and publicly opposed to German militarism—did not return to Germany. Albert and Elsa eventually settled permanently in the United States, making their home in Princeton, New Jersey.

Elsa’s health began deteriorating soon afterward. She developed serious heart and kidney problems and died on December 20, 1936, at the age of 60.

Albert never married again.

Elsa had spent nearly two decades as Einstein’s wife, companion and protector from the demands of fame. Their marriage was hardly conventional, and Einstein’s repeated infidelities make it difficult to portray it as a simple love story.

Yet she remained beside him through scientific triumph, worldwide celebrity, political upheaval and exile from Germany until her death.

Einstein changed humanity’s understanding of space, time and gravity.

His relationships proved far more difficult for him to solve.

At just 18 and 19 years old, Khudiram Bose and Prafulla Chaki were willing to die fighting British colonial rule—but the...
08/29/2026

At just 18 and 19 years old, Khudiram Bose and Prafulla Chaki were willing to die fighting British colonial rule—but their 1908 assassination attempt ended in tragedy when the bomb struck the wrong carriage.

On the evening of April 30, 1908, two young Bengali revolutionaries waited outside the European Club in Muzaffarpur, then part of British India.

Their names were Khudiram Bose and Prafulla Chaki.

Khudiram was 18. Prafulla was 19.

Both were associated with the revolutionary nationalist movement that had grown increasingly militant after the 1905 partition of Bengal. Their target was Douglas Kingsford, a British official who had earned the anger of revolutionaries for his harsh treatment of nationalist activists while serving as Chief Presidency Magistrate in Calcutta. He had later been transferred to Muzaffarpur.

The plan was to assassinate Kingsford as his carriage left the club.

But in the darkness, Khudiram and Prafulla made a catastrophic mistake.

The carriage they attacked was not carrying Kingsford.

Inside were Mrs. Kennedy and her daughter, relatives of British barrister Pringle Kennedy. Both women were fatally injured. Kingsford survived unharmed.

The two young revolutionaries immediately fled in different directions.

Khudiram abandoned his shoes near the scene and traveled through the night. By the following morning, he had covered roughly 24 to 25 miles on foot and reached Waini railway station.

He was exhausted, barefoot and carrying two revolvers and ammunition when two constables became suspicious of him. After questioning and a brief struggle, Khudiram was arrested. Court records later confirmed that he had been captured about 25 miles from Muzaffarpur.

Prafulla took a different route.

He reached Samastipur, where railway employee Triguna Charan Ghosh reportedly gave him shelter, fresh clothing and a railway ticket. But during his journey, police sub-inspector Nandalal Banerjee became suspicious of him and alerted authorities.

At Mokama Ghat, police attempted to apprehend Prafulla.

Rather than surrender, he shot himself and died before he could be taken into custody.

Khudiram was brought back to Muzaffarpur to face trial.

The proceedings became one of the most closely watched revolutionary cases of the period. His lawyers challenged the prosecution and attempted to save the teenager from ex*****on, but the evidence against him—including weapons found at his arrest and testimony connecting him to the scene—proved overwhelming.

On July 13, 1908, Khudiram Bose was sentenced to death.

Accounts from the period describe his extraordinary composure after hearing the sentence. Government historical records note that he smiled when the judgment was announced, while the Amrita Bazar Patrika later reported his death under a headline describing him as cheerful and smiling.

On August 11, 1908, Khudiram was hanged at Muzaffarpur.

He was only 18 years old.

His short life had already been marked by loss. Khudiram had lost his mother when he was about five and his father soon afterward. His elder sister raised him, and he became involved in revolutionary politics while still a schoolboy.

The deaths of the Kennedy women remain an essential part of the story. Khudiram and Prafulla intended to kill a colonial official, but their bomb instead killed two people who were not their intended targets. Remembering the two revolutionaries as figures of India’s anti-colonial struggle does not require overlooking the innocent lives lost in the attack.

Yet Khudiram’s ex*****on turned him into an enduring symbol of youthful resistance in Bengal.

Soon after his death, the Bengali patriotic song “Ekbar Biday De Ma Ghure Ashi,” attributed to Pitambar Das, became closely associated with his memory. Written as though Khudiram were bidding farewell before ex*****on, it became one of the best-known cultural tributes to him.

More than a century later, the names Khudiram Bose and Prafulla Chaki remain inseparable from the revolutionary phase of India’s independence movement.

They were extraordinarily young.

Their methods were violent.

Their mission ended tragically.

But their willingness to risk everything against an empire ensured that their names would survive long after both were gone.

Khudiram walked to the gallows at 18.

Prafulla died rather than be captured at 19.

And together, they became two of the most remembered young revolutionaries of the struggle against British rule.

She secretly traveled more than 800 miles for spring break. Hours after she vanished, her phone was moving through rural...
08/29/2026

She secretly traveled more than 800 miles for spring break. Hours after she vanished, her phone was moving through rural South Carolina without her—and the truth would remain hidden for 13 years.

In April 2009, 17-year-old Brittanee Drexel wanted to go to Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, for spring break.

Her mother, Dawn Drexel, refused to give permission because there would be no adult supervision.

Brittanee went anyway.

She told her mother she would be staying with friends near their home in the Rochester, New York, area, then secretly traveled more than 800 miles south with other teenagers to Myrtle Beach.

For several days, nothing appeared unusual.

Then, on the evening of April 25, Brittanee walked from the Bar Harbor Hotel, where she was staying, to the Blue Water Resort to visit friends.

Surveillance cameras captured the 17-year-old leaving the Blue Water Resort at approximately 8:48 p.m.

She intended to walk back to her hotel along Ocean Boulevard.

It was the last confirmed image of Brittanee alive.

Minutes later, she sent a final text message to her boyfriend in New York.

When he replied and received no response, he became concerned. He eventually contacted Brittanee’s mother, who learned for the first time that her daughter was actually in South Carolina.

Dawn called police.

Investigators immediately began tracing Brittanee’s cellphone.

The first signals showed the phone moving south from Myrtle Beach. One ping placed it near Surfside Beach, approximately six miles away. A later signal came from the Georgetown County area near the North Santee River, roughly 46 miles from where Brittanee had last been seen.

Those signals created a chilling mystery.

Brittanee had apparently left Myrtle Beach somehow, but no one knew who she was with.

Search teams combed wooded areas, waterways, roads and boat landings. Investigators used dogs and searched remote areas where her phone had last communicated with towers.

Nothing led them to Brittanee.

Days became months.

Months became years.

Her mother continued traveling to South Carolina, distributing photographs, speaking publicly and pleading for information.

Billboards displayed Brittanee’s face. Age-progressed images were created. Investigators followed hundreds of tips.

Yet the teenager appeared to have disappeared completely.

For years, several theories circulated about what might have happened. In 2016, testimony involving a jailhouse informant led investigators toward one particularly disturbing scenario involving other suspects.

That theory ultimately proved wrong.

The breakthrough came in 2022.

By then, investigators had returned their attention to a man named Raymond Moody, a convicted s*x offender who had previously been questioned in connection with the case.

Moody eventually confessed.

According to investigators, Brittanee had encountered Moody and Angel Cooper Vause on the night she disappeared. Federal prosecutors later said Vause helped lure Brittanee into their vehicle by offering the teenager a ride back to her hotel.

Instead, Brittanee was taken away from Myrtle Beach.

Authorities said Vause eventually left Brittanee alone with Moody and took Brittanee’s cellphone with her—the same phone investigators had been tracking as it moved south through South Carolina.

Moody admitted that he kidnapped, s*xually assaulted and killed Brittanee that night.

More than 13 years after her disappearance, he led investigators to a wooded area in Georgetown County.

In May 2022, investigators found human remains approximately four feet underground.

Dental records and DNA confirmed what Brittanee’s family had feared for more than a decade.

They had found her.

Raymond Moody later pleaded guilty to kidnapping, r**e and murder and received a sentence that will keep him imprisoned for life.

But the case did not entirely end there.

Investigators continued examining the role of Angel Cooper Vause.

For years, Vause had denied meaningful involvement and provided investigators with a different version of what happened.

Federal prosecutors said those statements were false.

In 2024, Vause pleaded guilty to lying to federal investigators about her role in Brittanee’s kidnapping and murder.

In February 2025, a federal judge sentenced her to 18 years in prison.

Prosecutors said she had helped lure Brittanee into the vehicle, left the teenager alone with Moody, and carried away Brittanee’s phone—removing what authorities described as her only chance to seek help.

For 13 years, Dawn Drexel lived without knowing where her daughter was.

She searched beaches, roads and forests.

She gave interviews.

She returned repeatedly to South Carolina.

She continued asking questions even when leads collapsed and theories proved wrong.

When Brittanee’s remains were finally recovered in 2022, the mystery of where she had gone was over.

But the answer was far more painful than the uncertainty.

Brittanee Drexel had not simply vanished into the marshes of South Carolina.

She had encountered people who exploited the vulnerability of a 17-year-old walking alone far from home.

Her cellphone continued traveling after she no longer controlled it, leaving investigators a trail that they would not fully understand until more than a decade later.

What began as a teenager secretly taking a spring-break trip became a 13-year search for truth.

Brittanee was finally brought home.

And after years of unanswered questions, the people responsible were finally held accountable.

Hunter S. Thompson did not want a quiet goodbye — he wanted to be fired into the sky.In August 2005, six months after th...
08/26/2026

Hunter S. Thompson did not want a quiet goodbye — he wanted to be fired into the sky.

In August 2005, six months after the death of legendary gonzo journalist Hunter S. Thompson, his friends and family gathered at his Colorado home for one of the most unforgettable memorials in literary history.

The event took place at Owl Farm in Woody Creek, near Aspen. At the center of the memorial stood a massive 153-foot tower, built in the shape of Thompson’s famous Gonzo symbol: a double-thumbed fist rising from a dagger. At the top was a cannon-like fireworks device designed to launch his ashes into the night sky.

The memorial was largely funded by Johnny Depp, Thompson’s close friend, who had portrayed him in the 1998 film Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas. Reports place the cost somewhere between $2.5 million and $3 million, making it one of the most extravagant literary farewells ever staged.

As fireworks exploded in red, white, blue, and green, Thompson’s ashes were blasted into the Colorado sky. It was loud, strange, excessive, and completely true to the man himself.

This was not a normal funeral.

It was a final act of Gonzo theater.

Thompson had reportedly talked for years about wanting his ashes fired from a cannon. Depp later said he was simply trying to make sure his friend’s final wish came true.

The private gathering included family, friends, and famous guests, but at its heart, it was a farewell to a writer who built his life around rebellion, chaos, humor, politics, danger, and wild American myth.

Hunter S. Thompson lived loudly.

And in death, he left the same way.

A nurse met a young doctor during his hospital rounds and suddenly recognized his name—28 years earlier, she had cared f...
08/26/2026

A nurse met a young doctor during his hospital rounds and suddenly recognized his name—28 years earlier, she had cared for him as a premature baby fighting to survive.

In 2018, neonatal intensive care nurse Vilma Wong was working at Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital Stanford in California when a new pediatric resident joined her team. His name was Dr. Brandon Seminatore, and for some reason, it immediately sounded familiar.

Wong had spent more than three decades caring for premature and critically ill newborns. During morning rounds, she began asking Brandon where he was from. He told her he had grown up in San Jose—and then mentioned that he himself had been born prematurely at the very same hospital.

That detail triggered a memory.

Wong remembered being the primary nurse for a premature baby with the surname Seminatore many years earlier. To confirm what she was beginning to suspect, she asked Brandon whether his father had been a police officer.

There was a moment of silence.

Then Brandon asked her whether her name was Vilma.

The answer was yes.

Twenty-eight years earlier, in 1990, Brandon had been born at just 29 weeks of pregnancy and required more than a month of treatment in the hospital’s neonatal intensive care unit. His premature lungs meant that he needed intensive medical support, including an incubator and mechanical ventilation while his body continued developing.

Vilma Wong had been one of the nurses who cared for him during those vulnerable first weeks of his life.

Brandon’s parents had never forgotten her.

When he later told them about meeting a nurse named Vilma, they sent him an old photograph they had preserved for nearly three decades. In the picture, Wong could be seen holding Brandon when he was still a tiny premature infant.

There was another remarkable detail: before Brandon began working at the hospital, his mother had actually told him to look for Vilma. He assumed that after so many years she had probably retired or moved elsewhere.

Instead, he eventually found himself working beside her.

By 2018, Brandon was a second-year pediatric resident specializing in child neurology, caring for some of the same vulnerable children whose position he had once occupied. Wong was still working in the NICU where she had helped care for him almost three decades earlier.

For Wong, seeing the premature infant she once cared for return as a physician was deeply emotional. For Brandon, the encounter offered a rare opportunity to personally thank someone who had helped him survive before he could possibly remember her.

Their reunion also highlighted something neonatal medical professionals rarely get to witness.

Doctors and nurses often care for critically premature infants during the most uncertain moments of their lives. Once those babies become healthy enough to leave the hospital, the staff may never learn what became of them.

Vilma Wong did.

The tiny premature baby she once held in her arms had returned 28 years later—not as a patient, but as a doctor standing beside her and caring for a new generation of children.

Nearly three decades separated their first photograph from their reunion, but both were taken in the same place where Brandon’s life had begun.

These spots are not tumors—they are parasitic cysts caused by tapeworm larvae that can invade the human brain and trigge...
08/25/2026

These spots are not tumors—they are parasitic cysts caused by tapeworm larvae that can invade the human brain and trigger seizures, headaches, and life-threatening complications.

Neurocysticercosis is a serious parasitic infection of the central nervous system caused by the larval stage of the pork tapeworm, Taenia solium. It develops when a person accidentally swallows microscopic tapeworm eggs, usually through food, water, or hands contaminated with human f***l matter containing the eggs.

An important distinction is often misunderstood: simply eating undercooked pork does not directly cause neurocysticercosis. Undercooked infected pork can cause taeniasis, in which an adult tapeworm develops in the intestine. Cysticercosis occurs when T. solium eggs themselves are swallowed through the f***l-oral route.

Once inside the digestive system, the eggs hatch and release larvae capable of penetrating the intestinal wall. These larvae can enter the bloodstream and travel to tissues throughout the body, where they develop into fluid-filled cysts called cysticerci.

The parasites may lodge in the muscles, skin, eyes, or central nervous system. When they reach the brain or other parts of the nervous system, the condition is known as neurocysticercosis.

What makes the disease particularly dangerous is that symptoms may not appear immediately. Larval cysts can remain relatively quiet for years. Problems often develop when the parasites begin to degenerate and the immune system reacts strongly to them, producing inflammation and swelling around affected areas of the brain.

The symptoms vary dramatically depending on the number, location, size, and stage of the cysts.

Some people remain completely asymptomatic. Others may develop persistent headaches, seizures, neurological deficits, vision problems, hydrocephalus—a dangerous buildup of fluid within the brain—or increased pressure inside the skull. Neurocysticercosis is an important preventable cause of epilepsy in regions where Taenia solium transmission is common.

Brain scans can sometimes produce astonishing images showing numerous lesions scattered throughout the nervous system. However, not every visible lesion necessarily contains a living parasite. Some cysts eventually die and calcify, leaving mineralized remnants that may remain visible on CT scans.

Diagnosis normally requires a combination of clinical evaluation and brain imaging such as CT or MRI, sometimes supported by laboratory testing and information about possible exposure.

Treatment is highly individualized.

Depending on the number and location of cysts and whether they are alive, degenerating, or calcified, physicians may use antiparasitic medications such as albendazole or praziquantel. Corticosteroids may be necessary to control inflammation, while anti-seizure medications can be used when epilepsy occurs. Some complicated cases involving obstruction or increased intracranial pressure can require surgery.

Because killing the parasites can itself provoke potentially dangerous inflammation in the brain, treatment must be carefully planned by medical specialists rather than simply giving antiparasitic medication immediately.

The disease is also largely preventable. Improved sanitation, proper handwashing, safe food and water practices, treatment of people carrying intestinal T. solium tapeworms, and improved pig-management practices can interrupt the parasite's life cycle.

Neurocysticercosis demonstrates how an organism too small to see with the naked eye at the moment of infection can eventually produce profound changes inside the human brain.

A microscopic tapeworm egg can enter through the digestive system—and years later, its presence may reveal itself through seizures and cysts deep inside the nervous system.

Address

11020 Audelia Rd
Dallas, TX
75243

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when History of the world posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Museum

Send a message to History of the world:

Shortcuts

Share

Category