28/03/2026
LEONARDO DA VINCI Vs MICHELANGELO BUONARROTI
In 1482 Leonardo, at the age of thirty, left Florence to Milan. At that time Michelangelo aged seven and was just learning how to read and write.
Leonardo was trained in the workshop of Verrocchio, serving as close a collaborator as a goldsmith, sculptor and painter. But the even multifaceted activity in Verrocchio workshop was not enough for him: his interest in the sciences to the study of mechanics, meterology, mathematics, botanic, geology and whatever else made him an artist very dispersive and unreliable, often incapable of completing the work. However these were multiple interests that made him a unique artist, of great originality, able to transfer in art all researches he carried out in the field of science, thus surpassing the traditional Florentine setting.
Michelangelo’s formation was much more articulate: a brief apprenticeship at the workshop of Ghirlandaio, then his training at the school of sculpture held in the San Marco Garden under the direction of Bertoldo di Giovanni and the discovery of his vocation as sculptor was soon encouraged by Lorenzo il Magnifico by hosting him in his private palace where he got in touch with the most brilliant minds of his entourage of intellectuals. Then he completed his apprenticeship in the Benedetto da Maiano workshop. His first model was, and could not be otherwise, Donatello, but had also studied and copied Giotto, Masaccio and Desiderio da Settignano, and admired Verrocchio: that's probably why his first trip abroad was in Venice to study the equestrian statue of Colleoni, that's in his Vatican Pietà Michelangelo literally quoted the Verrocchio Christ in the incredulity of Saint Thomas. The same as Leonardo he also sensed the importance of research in the field of Pollaiolo anatomy and movement.
Both artist were so deeply Florentine to know that drawing was the first step to make any kind of art, and, as a matter of facts they both were amazing drawers, nonetheless... their art look so different. Analysing the differences between these two great men would be a very long work, too long for this post, but we can at least take a look at their different personality. Leonardo loved beautiful and fashioned clothes, took a great care of his look, right the opposite of his rival; Leonardo liked having the fastest horses while Michelangelo didn’t care at all. Michelangelo always hated the comfortable life that Leonardo loved so much: a deluxe life would have been for Michelangelo a detriment for his creative inspiration, while Leonardo became more creative when he felt free from any economic problem: that’s why he accepted the invitation of Ludovico Sforza in Milan and lived in his court just thinking about how to develop all the ideas that came up to his mind. Leonardo was a very good-looking man: long blond curly hair, pretty tall and well proportioned in his body. Michelangelo was strong but very short. Even in sentimental matters, despite of being both homosexual, they could not be more at the opposite: Leonardo enjoyed living his sexuality and loved to be surrounded by beautiful boys. Even love was for Michelangelo a frivolity: we know that he fell in love just once with the beautiful roman noble Tommaso Cavalieri when he was in his fifties. Michelangelo worked hard all his life long always carrying a miserable life, getting huge amounts of money that he immediately reinvested in order to make the name of the Buonarroti family respected again after decades of decadence of the family. Leonardo hardly ever finished the works he had started: his curiosity always took him away from anything he was working at. Michelangelo was instead much more reliable: he worked hard until the work was finished so that he could cash the money, reinvest it and getting a new work.
Two very different personalities we can say. Who was right? Well, looking at their masterpieces I would say both.