100 Miles Project

100 Miles Project A forensic historical record of the lineside structures and people who lived beside the railway between Junee and Albury, NSW (we do stray outside this too).

We encourage everyone to contribute knowledge, stories and pictures.

15/04/1962, 3830 leading the first Standard Gauge Spirit of Progress stands on the loop line at Harefield waiting to cro...
02/06/2026

15/04/1962, 3830 leading the first Standard Gauge Spirit of Progress stands on the loop line at Harefield waiting to cross another service.

Before the location was remodeled later in the 1960's the platform was serviced by the main line.

NSW Archives Photo

Death, Duty and the South Western LineWhen people think about Junee’s railway history, they usually picture the grand st...
31/05/2026

Death, Duty and the South Western Line

When people think about Junee’s railway history, they usually picture the grand station, the roundhouse, the refreshment rooms or the endless procession of trains moving between Sydney and Melbourne.

But the first few kilometres west of Junee on the South West Line lies one of the most remarkable stretches of railway social history in regional New South Wales.

From the opening of the South Western Line in 1881 through to the 1970s, the corridor between Junee Junction and Old Junee became the setting for derailments, level crossing tragedies, murders, industrial accidents and the lives of generations of railway families. Across nearly one hundred years, the same few kilometres of railway repeatedly appeared in newspaper headlines, coronial inquiries and railway records.

Today much of the original infrastructure has disappeared beneath silos, roads and modern railway works, but the stories remain.

The story begins with a gatekeeper named Mary Pegg.

The South Western line toward Narrandera and Hay opened on 28 February 1881. The junction transformed Junee from a railway settlement into one of the most important operational centres in southern New South Wales. Trains now moved west toward Narrandera and Hay while the Main South continued north and south between Sydney and Albury.

To protect the roads crossing the new railway, gatekeepers were appointed at various locations west of Junee. Among the first was Mary Pegg, who became gatekeeper at the Narrandera Road Gates — later known as Pegg’s Gates and eventually O’Shannessy’s Gates.

The crossing stood near the site now occupied by the Junee Sub Terminal.

Mary lived there with her husband James, a fettler, and their eight children. The gatekeeper’s cottage would have been small even by railway standards, yet ten people somehow lived within it while trains passed day and night only metres from the front door.

Little is known about the original gatehouse itself, but the lives of the family who occupied it became deeply intertwined with the growth of Junee.

Tragedy arrived early. James Pegg died in April 1882, only a year after the line opened. Mary continued working as gatekeeper while raising the children alone.

The Pegg children would become woven into the social fabric of Junee for decades afterwards.

William Pegg would later become Mayor of Junee between 1913 and 1914. Ernest Pegg attended Junee’s first public school, became a sportsman, store owner and eventually the Daily Advertiser’s first Junee correspondent before rising through the ranks of Grace Brothers in Sydney. Percy Pegg became known locally as one of the district’s finest athletes and later gained national attention after shooting what newspapers described as a “tiger-cat” near Junee in 1901 after it killed his dog and attempted to attack him.

Another daughter, Minnie Foster, became one of the first waitresses employed in Junee’s original refreshment rooms before later training as a nurse. Eliza Arthur became the first railway employee’s daughter to marry in Junee, though tragedy followed her too when her husband died in a mining accident near Grong Grong in 1899.

In April 1889, the line west of Junee claimed its first major railway tragedy.

A mixed goods train operated by Driver George Oates and Fireman Alexander Ferguson struck cattle on the line just passed Pegg’s Gates. The locomotive derailed, overturned and slid down an embankment, killing both crewmen.

The subsequent investigation cast a harsh spotlight upon Mary Pegg and the operation of the crossing itself. Evidence suggested stock had entered the corridor and that danger signals had not been properly displayed to the approaching train. Ernest Pegg was reportedly already in the rail corridor attempting to remove the cattle as the train approached.

Ultimately the majority of blame was directed toward Driver Oates, who had allegedly received verbal and written warnings prior to departing Junee, but the derailment exposed the dangerous realities of nineteenth century railway operation where livestock, darkness and limited communication systems combined to create constant risk.

Even after the derailment, Pegg’s Gates remained a recognised landmark on the western side of town.

In 1890 the crossing again entered newspaper reports when police arrested a notorious Wagga Wagga murderer nearby. The man, known as Smith, had allegedly decapitated his victim before transporting and burying the head near the Methodist Church at Old Junee. Sergeant Dixon and Senior Constable William Anderson eventually apprehended him near Pegg’s Gates.

By the early 1900s the crossing increasingly became known as O’Shannessy’s Gates after gatekeeper Joseph O’Shannessy, suggesting Mary Pegg had retired around the turn of the century.

Another crossing west of town would soon gain notoriety of its own.

Treadwell’s Gates — near present-day Broadway and Gate Street — first appeared in records during the early 1890s. Also referred to at various times as Gas Works Crossing, Junction Lane, Gate Street and Kanaley Square, the crossing was another manually protected railway gate requiring constant attention.

The multiple names attached to the crossing reflected how rapidly the western side of Junee evolved during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Different generations referred to the location by nearby industries, road names, landmarks or the families associated with the crossing itself. While railway records generally settled on “Treadwell’s Gates,” locals continued using alternative names for decades afterwards.

Only weeks after Mrs Jones had been appointed gatekeeper in 1892, tragedy struck.

While closing the gates she noticed her three-year-old son standing between the rails. She turned and ran toward him with her arms extended. Moments later both were struck and killed by the Hay goods train.

The inquest recorded accidental death.

The story remains one of the most heartbreaking railway crossing incidents in NSW’s history.

Mrs Treadwell later resumed duties at the crossing and appears to have served there for decades with relatively little incident. Yet the railway itself was changing rapidly around her.

As motor vehicles became more common and railway authorities increasingly sought to reduce staffing costs, manually operated gates slowly disappeared across the state.

In 1922 the railway commissioners abolished the gatekeeper position at Treadwell’s Gates and installed cattle grids instead. Around the same period O’Shannessy’s Gates also became unattended, with the gates locked after 6pm each evening.

The changes reflected a broader shift in railway philosophy — replacing human protection with standardised infrastructure and expecting road users to assume more responsibility.

The consequences arrived quickly.

On Sunday night, 11 September 1927, one of the district’s worst crossing accidents occurred at Treadwell’s Gates.

Shortly after 10pm, a Chevrolet lorry carrying eight people attempted to cross the railway when it collided with a goods train consisting of 53 empty trucks.

The impact was catastrophic.

The lorry was struck side-on and dragged approximately 300 yards along the line while passengers, clothing and pieces of the vehicle were scattered across the railway corridor.

Mrs Frances Marion McGuire and Mrs Eileen Pearl Anderson were killed instantly. Ernest Pike was critically injured and later died in hospital without regaining consciousness. Two children survived suffering shock and abrasions.

Newspaper reports described a horrifying scene. Mrs McGuire’s body was located nearly one hundred yards from the crossing after being thrown clear of the vehicle. Mrs Anderson was found beside her mother near the line, while Ernest Pike remained trapped further down the track within the wreckage.

Investigators struggled to explain how the collision occurred. The crossing reportedly offered excellent visibility, the countryside was brightly illuminated by moonlight and the train itself could allegedly be seen for a considerable distance. Some reports suggested the side curtains fitted to the lorry may have restricted visibility for the occupants.

Railway officials later calculated the train driver brought the goods train to a stop within approximately fourteen seconds of impact, with locked wheels reportedly scorching the rails as the brakes were applied in emergency.

The Pike family already carried a tragic connection to the railway. Twenty-two years earlier Ernest Pike’s brother Harold had also been killed by a train near Junee station, while another relative, Percival Longhurst, had died in a separate railway accident near Table Top.

The 1927 disaster reignited criticism of the railway commissioners and renewed demands from Junee Council for gatekeepers to be reinstated at O’Shannessy’s Gates.

The debate reflected a railway system struggling to adapt to the growing presence of automobiles on roads originally designed for horses, carts and livestock.

Yet the railway dangers around Junee were not confined to level crossings alone.

Long before modern workplace protections and formal rail safety systems existed, the Junee locomotive depot (located beside the South West line) itself was an extraordinarily dangerous workplace.

In July 1900 railway employee John Garrett was killed while working inside the locomotive sheds at Junee.

Garrett had been drilling a hole in a locomotive while positioned between an engine and tender when another locomotive backed in for water and collided with the engine he was working on. The impact crushed him instantly. Newspaper reports described horrific injuries, stating his left arm was shattered and his chest “almost reduced to a pulp.” His workmate, Tom Jones, had only moments earlier stepped away to collect a tool and narrowly escaped the same fate.

The subsequent inquest later determined Garrett’s death resulted from the brake not being properly applied on the locomotive that struck the tender, while the involved firemen were formally exonerated from blame.

The Garrett tragedy demonstrated just how unforgiving the locomotive depot environment at Junee had become by the turn of the century.

Steam locomotives were constantly arriving, departing, taking water, disposing ash and being prepared for service. Workers moved between tightly packed engines, tenders and servicing roads where visibility was often poor and communication depended heavily upon whistles, shouted warnings and experience.

Even routine maintenance work could become fatal within seconds.

The dangers inside the Junee locomotive precinct would continue for decades.

On 15 December 1925 another railway employee, Alfred Sternes Baldwin, was struck and killed by the incoming south-west mail near the locomotive sheds shortly after finishing duty.

Evidence at the inquest painted a vivid picture of the steam-era depot environment. Locomotives stood around the sheds while another nearby engine was “blowing down” its boiler, creating enormous noise that witnesses believed likely drowned out the sound of the approaching train.

Other evidence suggested locomotives and tenders standing around the shed area obstructed visibility of the south-west line, leaving only a few yards of sighting distance from some crossing points used by employees moving to and from work.

Two witnesses described Baldwin casually walking from the shed area directly onto the line moments before the train struck him. The locomotive was reportedly only around twenty-five feet away when he stepped onto the track.

The driver of the south-west mail later testified that he had sounded the whistle several times approaching Junee while travelling at approximately thirty miles per hour, but the noise from another engine blowing down nearby would likely have drowned out the sounds of the incoming train.

The coroner ultimately returned a finding of accidental death and attached no blame to any individual.

Together, the deaths of Garrett and Baldwin highlighted another side of railway danger at Junee — not dramatic derailments or crossing collisions, but the constant everyday risks faced by railway workers operating within one of the busiest locomotive depots in southern New South Wales.

The final years of O’Shannessy’s Gates arrived during the postwar transformation of country railways.

In 1951 the site was selected for construction of a new bulk wheat terminal as part of the NSW Government’s push toward bulk grain handling. The old crossing and gatehouse — standing in some form since at least 1881 — disappeared with the construction of the modern grain facility.

We know a gatekeeper’s cottage existed at Treadwell’s crossing by at least 1892 because the deaths of Mrs Jones and her son occurred immediately adjacent to the crossing itself. Newspaper reports also record that Mrs Treadwell remained living in the former gatehouse after the gatekeeper role had been abolished and eventually passed away there in 1925.

As roads west of Junee were progressively realigned and Lord Street became the principal western route out of town, it is entirely possible the railways relocated one of the gatehouses away from the immediate crossing site for continued use as railway accommodation.

Relocating timber railway buildings was common practice throughout New South Wales during this era.

Then, in December 1942, tragedy again struck near O’Shannessy’s Gates.

Shortly after 8am on a Friday morning, railway fettlers Robert Charnley and Leslie Edward Unwin were travelling out to work on a railway tricycle when a light engine returning toward Junee from Narrandera collided with them near the slaughter yards of W. Duck.

Three tricycles carrying fettlers were travelling toward the oncoming engine. Charnley and Unwin occupied the leading tricycle when it was struck. The men on the following tricycles managed to jump clear moments before impact.

Charnley, seated with his back toward the locomotive as was customary on the tricycles, was thrown clear and killed instantly. Unwin was dragged beneath the engine and died at the scene.

The newspaper coverage immediately connected the collision with the earlier 1889 derailment involving Driver Oates and Fireman Ferguson, noting both incidents occurred at almost the exact same location west of Junee.

The deadliest incident of all came in May 1974.

Head Ganger Jack Hazel and fettlers Ron Young, Darryl Nuttall and Maurice Rynehart were working near the Junee sub terminal when they were struck and killed by the returning Riverina Express from Griffith.

At the time the service was operated by Tulloch rail motors, considerably quieter than locomotive-hauled passenger trains. Witnesses reportedly watched helplessly as the train approached the workers. A fifth member of the gang survived only by leaping clear at the final moment.

For families across the district the deaths left a lasting impact.

By then, almost everything connected to the original gatekeeper era had disappeared. Pegg’s Gates / O’Shannessy’s Gates no longer existed. Treadwell’s crossing had changed beyond recognition. The gatehouses had vanished from railway diagrams. Even the nature of railway operation itself had transformed entirely.

Today trains still leave Junee heading toward Narrandera and Hay exactly as they did in 1881. Grain trains rumble past the sites of forgotten crossings while motorists travel roads once protected manually by railway families living metres from the line.

Most people passing through would never realise how much history unfolded across those few kilometres of railway.

But beneath the modern infrastructure lies a story of duty, loss, resilience and change — a story carried by generations of railway families whose lives became permanently tied to the South Western line west of Junee.

One of the more interesting NSWGR diagrams I’ve come across recently can probably be dated fairly accurately to the shor...
23/05/2026

One of the more interesting NSWGR diagrams I’ve come across recently can probably be dated fairly accurately to the short period between November 1951 and May 1952.

The giveaway is the inclusion of the North Coast Daylight Express shown as being operated by a 4-car air-conditioned diesel train — the new DEB set. The first DEB set entered service on the North Coast route in November 1951, operating between Sydney and Grafton. However, persistent mechanical issues saw the set withdrawn in May 1952 after less than six months in service.

That alone narrows the diagram down considerably.

Another clue is the Queanbeyan to Cooma section, which is shown as operated by 2-car diesel trains rather than DEB sets. That would place the diagram before May 1955, when DEB sets began operating the Canberra-Monaro Express through to Cooma.

It’s a fascinating snapshot of NSWGR right in the middle of transitioning from steam-era passenger workings into the diesel railcar age. The DEB sets represented a major technological leap for the NSWGR — air-conditioned, lightweight, and designed specifically for long-distance daylight services.

For a brief period in 1951-52, though, the North Coast Daylight Express was one of the most modern trains in Australia, and this diagram appears to capture that exact moment in time!

Its Victorian, but i story i have read about more times than i can remember in my copy of "Victorian Railways to 62", a ...
22/05/2026

Its Victorian, but i story i have read about more times than i can remember in my copy of "Victorian Railways to 62", a book in my collection i had given to me by my 91 year old surrogate Grandmother, who purchased the book for 10 cents at a garage sale in Melbourne!

The night of 2 April 1884 was like countless others on Victoria’s growing railway network.

Trains moved across the colony under pressure to keep time. Goods services ran late as they often did. Telegraph instruments clicked, Stationmasters balanced timetables, crossings, and operational decisions across long stretches of single line railway where a single mistake could place opposing trains onto the same track.

By then, Victoria’s railways had already suffered serious accidents. Public confidence was low, and yet a dangerous operating culture had quietly taken hold across parts of the system — one where rules designed as absolute protections were increasingly treated as flexible when they interfered with punctuality and convenience.

The Werribee rail collision would expose just how fragile that system was.

The section between Werribee and Little River operated under the staff system, a safeworking method intended to guarantee only one train occupied a single-line section at any given time. In theory, the physical staff itself was the authority to proceed.

In practice, however, operational reality had drifted away from strict adherence.

Goods trains frequently ran late. Crossing locations changed depending on delays. Telegraph messages were increasingly used to suspend the normal protections of the staff system so traffic could continue moving.

As later evidence revealed:

“The staff system is so often suspended that the exception almost becomes a rule.”

That culture formed the real backdrop to the collision.

At Werribee station, Thomas Kiddle prepared to leave for church choir practice, something he routinely did on Wednesday evenings. Before leaving, he handed responsibility for operations to his daughter, Annie Biddle, who had assisted with railway and telegraph duties for years despite not officially being employed by the railways.

She was nearly seventeen years old and, by all accounts, familiar with railway procedure.

Kiddle’s instructions were straightforward.

If the delayed goods train arrived before 9.30 p.m., it was to continue toward Little River with the staff.

If it arrived after 9.30, it was to be placed into the siding at Werribee and a “line clear” telegram sent to allow the opposing passenger train through first.

It was an arrangement already revealing how operational flexibility had replaced rigid procedure.

That night, the goods train arrived at approximately 9.25 p.m.

It therefore departed correctly.

The staff was handed to the driver and the train proceeded into the section toward Little River.

Then came the moment that would define the disaster.

After the goods train had already departed, Annie Biddle sent a telegram to Little River:

“Please send on 7.10 train. I have staff and will keep line clear.”

The message effectively authorised the opposing passenger train to enter the same section of line already occupied by the goods train.

Years later, investigators and historians would still struggle to explain exactly why she sent it.

Even Annie herself could not explain.

Under questioning at the inquest, she admitted:

“I had not forgotten that the train had gone.”

And when repeatedly asked why she had sent the message, she could only say:

“I can’t say what made me send the message.”

There was no evidence of panic, distraction, or misunderstanding of the consequences. She knew the train had departed. She understood railway procedures. Yet the telegram was sent anyway.

At Little River, the message was accepted without hesitation.

Charles Jarvis Coles later testified that such telegrams were not unusual. Staff working was frequently suspended whenever delays occurred. Goods trains and passenger trains crossed at varying locations depending on running times.

The abnormal had become normal.

The passenger train was therefore authorised to proceed toward Melbourne.

Two trains were now travelling toward one another on the same single line.

The weather that night was poor. Witnesses described darkness, drizzling rain, and extremely limited visibility. One fireman later stated:

“You could not see your hand before you.”

The trains closed on each other somewhere between Werribee and Little River, near the open plains south-west of Melbourne.

Neither crew appears to have realised the danger until moments before impact.

Guards and firemen later stated that the headlights were not seen until the trains were virtually upon one another. One guard reportedly had only enough time to apply the brake before the engines collided.

The impact was catastrophic.

The locomotives smashed together head-on in the darkness. Carriages telescoped and splintered. Steam burst violently from ruptured boilers. Passengers were thrown through compartments and debris scattered across the track.

Three people were killed, including train driver Thomas Coe Kitchen and passenger Ellen Johnson. Many others suffered severe injuries.

And yet, newspapers of the day repeatedly remarked that the death toll could easily have been far worse.

At Little River station, staff initially noticed only an unusual glow and steam lingering in the darkness. The stationmaster and gatekeeper investigated before encountering survivors and guards emerging from the wreckage.

One guard reportedly delivered the chilling message:

“They have run into the goods train. Get back and telegraph Melbourne at once.”

Back at Werribee, Thomas Kiddle had only just resumed normal duties when the scale of the disaster began to unfold.

Spencer Street requested a report on the overdue passenger train.

Then Little River telegraphed asking:

“Where is goods train?”

Kiddle replied:

“It left here at 9.25.”

The response came back:

“Why did you send ‘line clear’?”

Kiddle answered:

“I did not send ‘line clear’.”

Only then did he discover what had happened.

Witnesses later described Kiddle becoming deeply emotional while giving evidence. He confronted his daughter, who was terrified and unable to explain her actions.

Shortly afterward, Kiddle submitted one of the most remarkable reports in Australian railway history.

He accepted complete responsibility:

“The whole of the blame is due to this station.”

He described leaving for choir practice, the instructions he had given his daughter, and his inability to comprehend how she could have allowed the train to depart and still send “line clear.”

Then came the line that captured the weight of the tragedy:

“To try and express my grief and sorrow for what has occurred would simply be impossible.”

Public reaction was immediate and fierce.

Newspapers condemned what they described as a “happy-go-lucky” railway culture. Editorials attacked the idea that railway operations had effectively been left in the hands of a child. Comparisons were drawn to earlier Victorian railway disasters, particularly the Hawthorn railway accident, arguing that little had been learned.

But the official inquiry soon revealed that the problem ran much deeper than one stationmaster’s poor judgement.

Judge George Webb Molesworth heard evidence exposing broader operational failures throughout Victorian Railways.

The inquiry found:

the staff system was routinely suspended,
train crossings occurred inconsistently,
timetables encouraged operational improvisation,
delayed goods trains were treated as emergencies,
and braking systems themselves may have been inadequate.

Most significantly, railway chairman Richard Speight dismissed claims that strict staff working was impractical in Victoria.

In Britain, he noted, much busier single-line railways operated safely under rigid discipline every day.

The issue was not capability.

It was culture.

The Werribee collision became an early lesson in something modern rail safety investigations now recognise instinctively:
catastrophic accidents rarely result from one isolated mistake.

They occur when systems slowly normalise unsafe behaviour.

By 1884, Victorian Railways had gradually become comfortable suspending protections whenever operations became inconvenient. The railway had unintentionally trained its people to work around the system rather than strictly within it.

That culture created the conditions where:

- a stationmaster could leave duty,
- a teenager could manage train operations,
- safeworking rules could be bypassed by routine telegram,
- and two trains could legally be authorised into the same section of track.

The collision at Little River was therefore not simply the story of one mistaken telegram.

It was the story of a railway system drifting away from discipline until one ordinary night exposed the consequences in the most violent way possible.

Original Junee Locomotive Depot, looking towards the station.
07/05/2026

Original Junee Locomotive Depot, looking towards the station.

Does anyone know where this?
The photo was at the Muttama Railway celebrations
No identification
Cootamundra???
Junee???
Sydney????
Any other suggestions?

Since the retro XPT is doing the rounds it is time to dust off this kids book featuring the train and have a look at the...
30/04/2026

Since the retro XPT is doing the rounds it is time to dust off this kids book featuring the train and have a look at the organisation that published it - Railways of Australia (ROA).

ROA was established in November 1963 as a cooperative body representing government-owned railway systems across Australia and New Zealand. It emerged at a time when railways were administered on a state-by-state basis, with limited formal coordination between systems. ROA provided a mechanism for those administrations to work together on matters of promotion, communication, and interstate services, rather than operations or regulation. The organisation was headquartered in Melbourne and maintained a sales office in London, reflecting its role in promoting rail travel to both domestic and international markets.

The membership consisted of the principal government railway administrations of the period:

- Commonwealth Railways
- New South Wales Government Railways
- Victorian Railways
- Queensland Railways
- South Australian Railways
- Western Australian Government Railways
- Tasmanian Government Railways
- New Zealand Railways Department

These organisations represented the full extent of government railway operations in Australia and New Zealand at the time.

ROA functioned as a coordinating and promotional body and did not control infrastructure, operations, or safety. It facilitated cooperation between member systems, particularly where services crossed state boundaries. One of its most visible outcomes was the introduction of the Indian Pacific in 1970, a service operating across multiple railway systems and marketed under a single identity.

ROA also produced a national railway journal, Network (from 1964), later Network Rail, which circulated information on developments, operations, and initiatives across member systems. Publication continued until 1999.

At the time of its operation, Australian railways were characterised by separate state administrations, differing track gauges and standards, and limited national coordination structures. Despite this, interstate freight and passenger services required ongoing cooperation. ROA provided a formal structure for that coordination, particularly in areas such as marketing, information sharing, and joint initiatives.

During the late 1980s and 1990s, the railway industry in Australia underwent structural reform, with government railway departments reorganised into corporatised entities and private operators entering the market. This reduced the relevance of an organisation based solely on government railway administrations. ROA was subsequently replaced by the Australasian Railway Association, which represents a broader range of industry participants, including private operators, infrastructure managers, and suppliers.

From what I can gather, this attached kids booklet published by ROA is from the mid to late 1980s (maybe the 88 festivities?) and probably belongs in a museum now.

If anyone knows more please leave it in the comments.

The Original Inland Rail— A True National Railway System in 1916In March 1915, just fourteen years after Federation, the...
11/04/2026

The Original Inland Rail— A True National Railway System in 1916

In March 1915, just fourteen years after Federation, the Commonwealth handed a task to Algernon J. Combes—not to build a railway, but to decide if one should exist at all.

The proposal was ambitious. A strategic standard gauge inland railway linking Port Augusta to Brisbane, cutting away from the coast and driving straight through the interior. But Port Augusta was not just a starting point. It was already the planned eastern connection of the transcontinental railway, the point where east–west movement across Australia met the developing inland network. Any line built from there wasn’t local—it was national.

Combes started where the system already made sense. From Melbourne the inland logic pushed north along the Murray corridor to Echuca, then across into New South Wales at Deniliquin. From there, the railway stepped out into open country and held its line through Hay—flat, direct, and free of the constraints that had shaped earlier lines.

This was not a railway following settlement. It was a railway choosing its ground.

Beyond Hay, the alignment intersected the Broken Hill line at Waranary (to the east of Trida), carried north through Nyngan and Burren Junction, into Moree, before crossing into Queensland near Inglewood. From Warwick, the line would lift over Cunningham's Gap and fall toward Brisbane.

By 1916, that inland spine had already been drawn.

But this was never just one line.

From Hay, terminus of the south west line, the concept extended west through Mildura and into South Australia at Terowie, continuing north through Peterborough and back to Port Augusta. That connection tied the inland spine directly into the transcontinental system, linking east–west and north–south movement through a single inland network.

At the same time, an alternative northern connection was considered. Instead of relying entirely on lines east of Broken Hill, a more direct route pushed west across South Australia to meet the original Central Australia Railway near Hawker, then followed existing formation south into Port Augusta—again feeding directly into the transcontinental link.

Taken together, it was something far bigger than a single railway.

It was a national system in concept:

- An inland spine from Melbourne to Brisbane
- A western connection through Hay and Mildura into South Australia
- A northern link tying Broken Hill directly into the Central Australia Railway
All anchored at Port Augusta—the junction between inland Australia and the transcontinental railway

Combes wasn’t there to promote it. He was there to test it. His experience—across the tropics of the Malay States and the difficult country of eastern Victoria—had taught him that railways only worked when the land and the traffic justified them. The inland alignment did. It followed workable country, avoided excessive engineering, and connected regions that could sustain movement.

But there was a problem that engineering couldn’t solve.

The system depended on cooperation. It relied on New South Wales completing its western links. It required different railways, built to different gauges, under different governments, to act as one. The Commonwealth could draw a national railway, but it could not compel the states to build it.

That was where it failed.

The lines made sense. The country would carry it. But the nation wasn’t ready to deliver it.

The proposed railways were never built.

Years later, Combes would say plainly that railways through poor country would not pay. Lines built on assumption would fail. The routes had to follow what the land could sustain.

That thinking never changed.

A century later, the same idea returned as the modern Inland Rail—again turning away from the coast, again pushing through the inland spine, again following the broad corridor through western New South Wales and southern Queensland.

The alignment is not identical, but the thinking is.

What is being built today was already understood in 1916.

The original Inland Rail was drawn just fifteen years after Federation—anchored to the transcontinental railway at Port Augusta—long before the country was ready to build a true national system.

Address

Junee, NSW

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when 100 Miles Project posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Share

Category