Historical Battle

  • Home
  • Historical Battle

Historical Battle This page is mainly set up for those who loves battle history and war fought around the globe

United States, Apache War (1871-1873)The Apache heritage was one of raiding and warfare. Following the APACHE UPRISING d...
26/09/2022

United States, Apache War (1871-1873)

The Apache heritage was one of raiding and warfare. Following the APACHE UPRISING during 1861 to 1865, there were several years of neither peace nor formal warfare, during which the Apaches resisted the advance of white American settlers and U.S. troops into the Southwest with swift raids and even swifter retreats to their mountain hideouts.

Not until April 15, 1870, with the establishment of
the military Department of Arizona, did the U.S. government and its army fully confront the Apache “threat” to settlement. The department’s first commander, General George Stoneman (1822–94), vitiated the army’s purpose in creating the department when he established his headquarters not in Arizona but on the California coast. He also sought to deal with the Apaches in accordance with the “peace policy” of President Ulysses S. Grant (1822–85), designed as a “conquest by kindness” under which Native
American tribes were no longer to be considered sovereign nations but wards of the state subject to civilian—not military—supervision.

The Indians would be concentrated on reservations, where they would be “civilized”: educated, Christianized, and taught tobecome self-supporting farmers. Accordingly, Stoneman had set up a series of “feeding stations” for Apaches who renounced raiding. Stoneman’s
remoteness from the scene, combined with his “benevolent” approach to what was at the time a military problem, brought accusations of spineless incompetence from the outraged citizens—and influential newspaper editors—of Arizona.

Conditions were ripe for a citizen uprising. Lieutenant Royal E. Whitmam in charge of Camp Grant, a feeding station on the lower San Pedro River, was performing his assignment well, cultivating the trust and cooperation of Aravaipa and Pinal Apache. As far as local settlers were concerned, Whitman was doing his job too well. They believed that Camp Grant served as a sanctuary for Indians between raids, and on April 30, 1871, six Americans, 48 Mexicans, and 92 Papago Indians attacked the Apache rancheria at Camp Grant, killing from 86 to 150 Indians, mostly women and children. Twenty-nine children were captured and sold into slavery.

The Camp Grant Massacre, as it came to be called, resulted in the replacement of General Stoneman by General George Crook (1829–90), who took command of the department in June 1871.

President Grant wanted peace with the Apaches, and this is precisely what Crook hoped to achieve. He decided that the best way to achieve peace
was to hand the Apaches a sound thrashing beforning negotiations. The notion brought him into conflict with Vincent Colyer (1825–88), Grant’s secretary of the Board of Indian Commissioners, who compelled Crook to suspend operations until he had finished his negotiations.
To his credit, Colyer made some inroads, but the citizens of Arizona continued to endure raids and terror. Crookissued an ultimatum to the Indians: Report to an agency by February 15, 1872, or be treated as hostile. This time, it was General Oliver O. Howard (1830–1909) who overruled him by opening up another peaceful dialogue. Neither Colyer nor, initially, Howard had any success in dealing with the legendary Chiricahua Apache leader Cochise (c. 1810–74), and without the participation of Cochise, there could be no genuine peace with the Apaches.

Finally, late in 1872, Howard enlisted the aid of
frontiersman Thomas J. Jeffords (1832–1914), known tobe a trusted friend of the Chiricahua leader, to es**rt him to “Cochise’s Strong-hold,” where he at last succeeded in hammering out a tentative peace.

At least, he created a situation in which some 5,000Apaches and Yavapais (a tribe distinct from the Apaches, but often called Apache Mohaves) claimed peaceful intentions and began to draw rations from a newly organized system of reservations. In fact, from 1871 to 1872 Apache
raids continued unabated. It was difficult to distinguish between Apaches who professed peace in good faith and those who used the reservations as a cover for their crimes. In any case, Arizona settlers were unwilling to make distinctions. They demanded that Crook and his soldiers be turned loose upon the Apaches, and they threatened to force the army’s hand by staging another Camp Grant Massacre. Faced with citizen anger and the realities of life in Arizona, the Indian Bureau at last authorized Crook to proceed not to declare outright war but to campaign systematically against the Apaches. Crook applied all that he had learned in fighting the Paiutes in Oregon and Idaho. He stressed the use of Indian scouts and auxiliaries, mobility, and determined pursuit until the enemy was engaged and defeated. He took charge of the U.S. troops in Arizona and New Mexico, split them into small squads, and sent them out first to find Apaches,
then capture or kill them.

On November 15, 1872, Crook began an ambitious sweep through Arizona, a winter campaign that aimed at the concentration of hostile Apaches in the Tonto Basin, where they could be dealt with at once and en masse. It was a relentless operation, involving continual pursuit, about 20 actual engagements, 200 Indians killed—76 at the Battle of Skull Cave (December 28, 1872) alone, where 100 Yavapais were cornered in a cave in a wall of Salt River Canyon, and the heavy fire resulted in ricocheting bullets that caused many deaths. But the most punishing aspect of the campaign was the pursuit. Kept constantly on the move, the Indians were forced repeatedly to abandon shelter and provisionsThe Battle of Turret Peak (March 27, 1873) was the “laststraw.” Under the command of Captain George M. Randall, elements of the 23rd Infantry surprised an Indian rancheria, killing 23. Throughout the spring and into the summer, Apaches dejectedly reported to reservations. Even more significantly, Crook managed to keep the peace for four years—an unprecedented span in so volatile a region.

26/09/2022

Mongol Invasion was unsuccessfully as Heavy typhoon wipe out their fleet, with this they never return to Japan again

Battle of singara (Roman-Persian War)With the emperor Contantius rushing troops to the East to try to fill the void left...
19/09/2022

Battle of singara (Roman-Persian War)

With the emperor Contantius rushing troops to the East to try to fill the void left by the seven lost legions, Antoninus’ plan for the Persians to invade all the Roman East was held in abeyance. But in the spring of AD 360, the Persians andtheir allies returned to Roman Mesopotamia, their numbers bolstered by new recruits and bringing new siege equipment with them.

Shapur and his men had acquired a taste for victory and for plunder, and before they looked beyond theEuphrates there were many Roman fortresses with which to deal.The first objective was Singara, which Shapur had besieged several times inthe past fourteen years. This time, he was determined to deprive the Romans ofthe city permanently. The 1st Parthica Legion had been based at Singara ever since the end of Septimius Severus’ Parthian campaign in AD 199. After thePersian wars had begun in AD 337, the 1st Parthica was joined by the 1st FlaviaLegion, a probable creation of Constantius or his father Constantine—the first name of both was Flavius—and more recently also joined by a few cavalry.After several days of fighting at the walls of Singara, Shapur brought up “a ram of uncommon strength” at twilight. This went to work against a round towerthat had been breached in the last Persian assault on Singara, twelve years before.

The breach had been repaired by the Romans since then, but Shapur reasoned that the tower would have been weakened by the previous destruction,and this proved to be the case. The massive battering ram brought the towertumbling down, and Persian hordes poured through the wreckage. The city wasquickly taken. Most of the men of the 1st Parthica and 1st Flavia legions weretaken alive. They were “led off with their hands bound” to become slaves in the farthest reaches of Persia.The Persians then moved on to the town of Bezabde near the Tigris (today’s Cizre in southeastern Turkey), which was then a hilltop town with strong walls. Bezabde was defended by the 1st Parthica’s brother legion, the 2nd Parthica.

This unit had been tipped out of its comfortable base at Alba Longa, outsideRome, by Constantine the Great in AD 312, following his victory at the MilvianBridge. They were then sent to the farthest reaches of the empire in punishmentbecause of their support for Constantine’s opponent Maxentius. At Bezabde, the2nd Parthica was joined by the 2nd Flavia, and another relatively new legion, the2nd Armenia. The garrison also included a large number of archers of the Zabdiceni tribe, whose territory around Bezabde this was.After a surrender offer was rebuffed by the Roman defenders, the Persianslaunched a siege of Bezabde, and attempted to bring a number of battering ramsinto action. On the difficult sloping ground, and against determined opposition
from defenders raining down stones, arrows and firebrands, it was only thelargest of the rams, which had a covering of wet bull hides that could not be setalight, that succeeded in doing damage to the wall. Inevitably, the ram, “with its huge beak,” weakened a tower in the wall, which crumbled and fell.

As usual, Persians attackers surged through the opening created by the fallentower. “Bands of our soldiers fought hand-to-hand with the enemy,” saidAmmianus.Vastly outnumbered, the defenders were overwhelmed, as thePersians ran amok in the city, killing everyone who fell into their path, male andfemale, as Bezabde was mercilessly plundered. But unlike Amida and Singara,the city was not leveled; Shapur decided to retain and strengthen Bezabde as a Persian fortress. Meanwhile, from the surrendered legions and civilian survivorsof Bezabde, “a great throng of captives” was led off to the Persian camp.

The 2nd Parthica Legion and the other units with it ceased to exist.The Notitia Dignitatum, which is believed by some scholars to have beenupdated, in part, in around AD 420, still showed the 1st Parthica and 2nd Parthicalegions as part of the garrison under the Duke of Mesopotamia at that time,together with twelve cavalry units and two cohorts of auxiliary foot soldiersincluding the Zabdenorii. Ammianus shows that these legions perished at Amidaand Singara. The listing in the Notitia Dignitatum for Mesopotamia actually appears to reflect the situation there prior to Constantius’ Persian wars—that is,prior to AD 337. Because, at the time the Notitia Dignitatum was said to havebeen last amended, the Roman province of Mesopotamia had not existed for
many years.

In AD 361, Constantius arrived in the East with a large army. Having blamedCount Ursicinus for the losses in Mesopotamia and dismissed him from office,Constantius personally led his army into Mesopotamia. He wept over the ruinsof Amida, and attempted to lay siege to Persian-held Bezabde. But unlike theRomans before them, the Persian defenders held out. With the rainy season
approaching, the Roman army, unable to achieve what the Persians had achieved at the very same place a year earlier, gave up the siege of Bezabde and withdrew to Syria. Constantius died in AD 361. He was on his way back to the west at the time,for his cousin and deputy Julian had been hailed as emperor by the troops inGaul in opposition to Constantius. Julian, victor against the Germans at Argentoratum in AD 357, became the undisputed new emperor. Called Julian theAfter a surrender offer was rebuffed by the Roman defenders, the Persians launched a siege of Bezabde, and attempted to bring a number of battering rams
into action. On the difficult sloping ground, and against determined oppositionfrom defenders raining down stones, arrows and firebrands, it was only the largest of the rams, which had a covering of wet bull hides that could not be set alight, that succeeded in doing damage to the wall. Inevitably, the ram, “with its huge beak,” weakened a tower in the wall, which crumbled and fell.

As usual, Persians attackers surged through the opening created by the fallentower. “Bands of our soldiers fought hand-to-hand with the enemy,” said Ammianus. Vastly outnumbered, the defenders were overwhelmed, as thePersians ran amok in the city, killing everyone who fell into their path, male and female, as Bezabde was mercilessly plundered. But unlike Amida and Singara, the city was not leveled; Shapur decided to retain and strengthen Bezabde as aPersian fortress. Meanwhile, from the surrendered legions and civilian survivorsof Bezabde, “a great throng of captives” was led off to the Persian camp. The
2nd Parthica Legion and the other units with it ceased to exist.

The Notitia Dignitatum, which is believed by some scholars to have beenupdated, in part, in around AD 420, still showed the 1st Parthica and 2nd Parthicalegions as part of the garrison under the Duke of Mesopotamia at that time,together with twelve cavalry units and two cohorts of auxiliary foot soldiers including the Zabdenorii. Ammianus shows that these legions perished at Amidaand Singara. The listing in the Notitia Dignitatum for Mesopotamia actuallyappears to reflect the situation there prior to Constantius’ Persian wars—that is,prior to AD 337. Because, at the time the Notitia Dignitatum was said to havebeen last amended, the Roman province of Mesopotamia had not existed for many years. In AD 361, Constantius arrived in the East with a large army. Having blamed Count Ursicinus for the losses in Mesopotamia and dismissed him from office, Constantius personally led his army into Mesopotamia. He wept over the ruins of Amida, and attempted to lay siege to Persian-held Bezabde. But unlike the Romans before them, the Persian defenders held out.

With the rainy season approaching, the Roman army, unable to achieve what the Persians had achieved at the very same place a year earlier, gave up the siege of Bezabde and withdrew to Syria.Constantius died in AD 361. He was on his way back to the west at the time,for his cousin and deputy Julian had been hailed as emperor by the troops in Gaul in opposition to Constantius. Julian, victor against the Germans at Argentoratum in AD 357, became the undisputed new emperor Called Julian the Apostate by later historians because he personally renounced Christianity, he removed Christians from the Roman army, with whom he was enormously popular. Julian would take up where Constantius left off in the East, leading an
army to recover Mesopotamia.

But on June 26, AD 363, after just twenty months as emperor, 31-year-old Julian died while leading a Roman army of 65,000 men in a bloody but ultimately indecisive battle against Shapur the Great’s army deep inside Persia.Rushing into the fight without his armor, Julian was mortally wounded by a flying spear from a Persian cataphract that pierced his liver. Finding itself in the heart of Persia with neither leader nor direction, the Roman army hastily hailed as Julian’s successor 30-year-old Jovianus, or Jovian, who had little claim to the throne, being a middle-ranking commander of the bodyguard and son of a retired count. Jovian immediately agreed to the demands of those around him that the Roman army pull out of Persia and Mesopotamia.

So it was that, in the summer of AD 363, four years after the end of Amida and three years after the fall of Singara and Bezabde, the new Roman emperor Jovian surrendered five Roman provinces in Mesopotamia and southern Armenia to King Shapur the Great, and gave up all claim to fifteen key fortress locations including those at Nisibis and Singara. Harried by the Persians all the way, the Roman army withdrew beyond the Euphrates.

Eight months after ascending the throne, Jovian himself was dead, to be succeeded in turn by Valentinian, who had served as a cavalry tribune underJulian at the Battle of Argentoratum. But the damage in the East had been done; Roman Mesopotamia ceased to exist, just as the legions that had unsuccessfully attempted to defend it ceased to exist.In just three sieges in AD 359 and 360, the Persians had deprived Rome of twelve legions. Many authorities believe that by this time the number of men in each legion was substantially less than had been the case in early imperial times.Gibbon spoke of legions of this time being “of the diminutive size to which they had been reduced in the age of Constantine.” Legions of 2,000 to 3,000 men by this time seem the norm.

Such losses of manpower and equipment to the Persians, combined with thenumber of Roman fighting men lost in the interminable revolts within the empirein the fourth century, could not be sustained. Within half a century, the drain on Roman resources would mean that there would not be the men to spare fromdistant provinces when crises arose in the west. The Roman East had its own battles to fight. Only brilliant generalship would keep the empire’s countless
enemies off the road to Rome.

Tuscarora War (1710–1715)The Tuscaroras, who lived inland from the Atlantic seacoast, along the coastal rivers of North ...
18/09/2022

Tuscarora War (1710–1715)

The Tuscaroras, who lived inland from the Atlantic seacoast, along the coastal rivers of North Carolina, were initially inclined to be friendly to their colonial neighbors. By the first decade of the 18th century, however, they were suffering indignities and abuses, especially at the hands of local English traders. Plying the Tuscaroras with liquor,traders cheated them out of goods and territory—though,in the case of the latter, there was rarely even the semblance of a business transaction, as settlers simply squatted on the Tuscaroras’ best land. Worse, traders began kidnapping Tuscaroras and selling them into West Indian slavery. As if this were not misery enough, Iroquois raiding parties from the north were ambushing isolated groups of Tuscarora hunters.

After enduring this situation for some years, the Tuscaroras, still wishing to avoid war, petitioned the government of Pennsylvania in 1709 for permission to migrate there. Authorities were willing to grant the necessary permission only if the Tuscarora settlers could secure a note
from the government of North Carolina attesting to their good conduct. Although the Tuscaroras had shown great for bearance under considerable pressure, the North Carolinians refused to furnish the required certificate—allowing the Tuscaroras to leave would have meant relinquishing a valuable inventory of slaves.

About a year later in 1710, a band of Swiss colonists organized by an entrepreneur named Baron Cristoph vonGraffenried (1661–1743) settled on a tract of North Carolina land at the confluence of the Neuse and Trent Rivers
that they christened New Bern. There was a problem,however; the tract of land was already part of an extended Tuscarora village. Instead of attempting to negotiate with the Indians, von Graffenried complained to North Carolina’s surveyor general, who affirmed that as far as the
colonial government was concerned, the von Graffenried settlers held clear title to the land. The surveyor general told the Swiss promoter that he was perfectly within his rights to drive the Indians off without payment, which he did.

At dawn, on September 22, 1711, the Tuscaroras’ for bearance at last gave way to violence. A raiding party attacked New Bern and other settlements in the area,killing 200 settlers, including 80 children. Von Graffenried managed to secure his release—as well as a pledge from theIndians not to attack New Bern again—by promising to make no war on the Tuscaroras. One of his settlers, William Brice (fl. early 18th century), thirsting for revenge was unwilling to abide by von Graffenried’s promise. He captured a local chief of the Coree tribe, allied with the Tuscaroras, and burned him alive.The Tuscaroras, Corees,and other, smaller tribes, renewed their raids.

The situation was out of hand, and North Carolina
officials sought aid from South Carolina. South Carolina dispatched Irish-born Colonel John Barnwell (c. 1671–1724) in command of 30 militiamen and 500 Indian allies,many of them Yamassees. The South Carolinian force took
a great toll on Tuscarora settlements and those of theirallies. Barnwell, heartened by his victories, his forces augmented by a contingent from North Carolina, directed an attack against the stronghold of the Tuscarora “king” Hancock (fl. early 18th century) in March 1712. The North Carolina men proved unreliable. Meeting fiercer opposition than they had anticipated, they broke ranks in a panic, and the assault failed. The Indians asked for a peace parley, but Barnwell refused. In response, the Tuscaroras began to torture their captives in full view of Barnwell’s men. Finally, Barnwell agreed to withdraw in return forthe release of the captives. The Tuscaroras agreed, and Barnwell returned to the New Bern settlement.

The North Carolina assembly angrily ordered him
back to the front. Nothing less than the reduction of Hancock’s “fort”—the Tuscaroras, like many eastern tribes, lived behind village palisades—was acceptable. Barnwell marched back in greater force, bullied Hancock into signing a peace treaty, then, marching back to New Bern, summarily violated his own treaty by seizing a party of
Tuscaroras and selling them as slaves. War was renewed in the summer of 1712, and North
Carolina again appealed to South Carolina for help. This time, the neighboring colony sent Colonel James Moore(fl. early 18th century) with a force of 33 militiamen and1,000 Indians. They arrived in November 1712, combined with North Carolina troops, and in March 1713 struck at the principal concentration of Tuscarora warriors. Hundreds of Tuscaroras died in this battle, and 400 were captured. The proceeds of their sale into slavery, at £10 each, helped defray the cost of the campaign. Many Tuscaroras who escaped death or enslavement migrated northward,eventually as far as New York, where they were given asylum among the Iroquois and, in 1722, were admitted into the Iroquois League as its “sixth nation.” A smaller faction, led by a chief the English called Tom Blount (d. after1732), remained in North Carolina, signing a peace treaty on February 11, 171.

CREDIT: ENCLOYPEDIA OF WAR

The Battle of LepantoThe Battle of Lepanto was a naval engagement that took place on 7 October 1571 when a fleet of the ...
17/09/2022

The Battle of Lepanto

The Battle of Lepanto was a naval engagement that took place on 7 October 1571 when a fleet of the Holy League, a coalition of Catholic states (comprising Spain and most of Italy) arranged by Pope Pius V, inflicted a major defeat on the fleet of the Ottoman Empire in the Gulf of Patras. The Ottoman forces were sailing westward from their naval station in Lepanto (the Venetian name of ancient Naupactus – Greek Ναύπακτος, Ottoman İnebahtı) when they met the fleet of the Holy League which was sailing east from Messina, Sicily. The Spanish Empire and the Venetian Republic were the main powers of the coalition, as the league was largely financed by Philip II of Spain, and Venice was the main contributor of ships.

On September 16, 1571, a large Christian fleet set sail from Sicily on an expedition to relieve Venetian-owned Cyprus, then under attack by the Ottoman Empire. Most of the men and galleys had been supplied by Venice and Habsburg Spain, but Genoa, the Papacy, Savoy, and Malta’s Knights of St.John had all made contributions.In command was the Habsburg prince Don John of Austria.

As his fleet drew near to where the Ottomans lay at Lepanto in western Greece, Don John organized the galleys into four squadrons: that on the right commanded by Genoese GiovanniAndrea Doria, the left under Venetian Agostino Barbarigo, the center under Don John himself. Spanish admiral Santa Cruz was placed in reserve.Facing the Christian fleet, the Ottoman forces advanced in a crescent,with the admiral Ali Pasha in the center, the right wing under Suluc Mehmed Pasha, and the left under the feared corsair Uluç Ali, an Italian-born convert to Islam. As the moment for combat approached Don John had the Holy League’s banner of Christ crucified raised above his flagship, Real. Ali Pasha sailed under a banner embroidered 29,800 times with the name of Allah.

The Christians placed their faith in firepower. Most of their galleys hadacenterline cannon or culverin in the bows firing up to a 60 lb (25 kg) iron shot, flanked by up to four smaller cannon, plus many swivel guns and soldiers with arquebuses. The Ottomangalleys were smaller than the Spanish
ones, but similar to the Venetian. They had fewer and less powerful cannon and their soldiers depended more on composite bows than on fi****ms. The Ottomans hoped to maneuver, ram,
and board the Christian vessels. Both sides hoped to maintain formation and avoid being attacked on the flank.

Crucially, the Venetians also provided six galleasses—large transport galleys turned into floating gun platforms. These were so unwieldy they had to be towed into position, but their massed guns packed a formidable punch. The presence of the galleasses was a surprise to the
Ottomans.They were unsure of their tactical function, but soon found out as the thunder of the galleases’ guns sent a savage hail of iron balls lashing into the galleys of the Ottoman center.
Although his fleet was thrown into disorder and two galleys had been sunk,Ali Pasha pressed on past the galleassesand through the fire from the galleysbehind to engage the Christian center
at close quarters.

On the flanks a desperate battle was joined as the horns of the Turkish crescent attempted to outflank the Christian line.TheVenetian galleys on the Christian left were close to shore, but some of Suluc’s ships succeeded in rowing through shallow water beyond the edge of their line. Barbarigo’s galleys skillfully backed to turn outward facing toward the shore, presenting their bow guns to the Ottoman ships, which were forced to turn to face them. A close-quarter mêlée ensued, in which Barbarigo was hit by an arrow and killed.On the Christian right there was open water. Uluç Ali tried to outflankDoria’s squadron, and Doria shifted further to the right to block him. This stretched the line between the Christian right and center. Choosing his moment, the wily Uluç Ali turned swiftly back to attack the straggling Christian galleys left behind by Doria’s rightward move.

By this stage, cloaked in a fog of gunpowder smoke, the battle was a scene of brutal slaughter. Everywhere galleys were locked together, soldiers fighting hand-to-hand on the decks
with sword and pike. At the heart of the battle, Don John’s flagship was boarded by janissaries—elite Ottoman infantry—from Ali Pasha’s Sultana. The key to the outcome was the use of the reserve squadron made by Santa Cruz. Feeding his galleys into the action where they were needed, he enabled the Venetians on the left to hold and then put to flight their adversaries—many Ottoman troops escaping through the
shallow water onto land.Santa Cruz then decisivelyintervened in the struggle in the center.

The Sultana was stormed and taken. Ali Pasha’s severed head was displayed on a pike and the Ottoman standard struck from the mast. As the Ottoman center collapsed, fighting turned to
massacre and plunder. Only Uluç Ali was able to extricate his galleys from the debacle, leading perhaps a sixth of the original force back to Constantinople.The Ottomans quickly built a new
fleet—their grand vizier bragged that theChristians had merely shaved the Ottoman beard that “would grow all the better for the razor.” But Christian jubilation at victory in one of the largest sea battles ever fought was justifiable,for it stemmed the tide of Ottoman expansion that had threatened to engulf the whole Mediterranean.

Spanish Conquest Of Aztecs Empire When the European mercantile powers began exploringthe Western Hemisphere in the 16th ...
16/09/2022

Spanish Conquest Of Aztecs Empire

When the European mercantile powers began exploringthe Western Hemisphere in the 16th century, few NewWorld expeditions, Spanish or otherwise, actually turnedup gold, but a handful of discoveries were sufficient tofuel further expeditions.

The most celebrated “discoveries” were those of Hernán Cortés (1485–1547).In 1519, Cortés landed a small force of 600 at what istoday Veracruz, Mexico, where he was greeted by ambassadors of the Indian king Moctezuma II (c. 1480–1520).They bore lavish gifts intended to appease, but Cortés onlydemanded more. In search of gold, Cortés marched uponTenochtitlán—capital city of a people who called themselves variously the Mexicas, or the Aztecs. He launched hismarch by boring holes in the hulls of his own ships (he toldhis men it was the work of worms) so that there could be noturning back. Along the way to Tenochtitlán, he recruitedallies among the ever-warring city-states of the far-flung and much-resented Aztec Empire.

Despite widespread hatred ofthe Aztec rulers, recruitment was not always a peacefulexercise. The people of Cholula were won over only afterCortés slaughtered 3,000of them in two hours.Perhaps at the news of this, Moctezuma lost any hearthe may have had for a fight. Perhaps he believed Cortés tobe the incarnation of the birdlike god Quetzalcoatl, whocreated man out of his own blood. In any case, he openedhis magnificent city to them.As far as anyone can tell, the Aztec Empire as Cortésfound it in 1519 was relatively new. Before the 14th century, the Aztec appear to have been only one among severalnomadic tribes wandering through Central America. Justas Spanish imperial ambitions claimed inspiration from theword of God, so the Aztecs claimed to have heeded the word and commandment of the war god Huitzilopochtli,who enjoined the tribe to conquer all about them and harvest the blood of the conquered.

Thus driven, within thespace of two centuries, the demands and the fruits of continual warfare created a vast, complex empire of dark
beauty, extending from the Gulf of Mexico to the Pacificand from the Valley of Mexico south into Guatemala.It is possible that the conquest of this Aztec Empire,might have been accomplished without wholesale killinghad another European not appeared on the scene. Cuba’sgovernor Pánfilo de Narváez (c. 1470–1528) was both
inept and jealous of Hernán Cortés. Narváez conducted anexpedition from Cuba to Mexico, intending to arrest hisrival conquistador for overstepping the authority grantedhim.

Cortés set out from Tenochtitlán to meet the governor’s forces, leaving the imperial city in the hands of onePedro de Alvarado (1485–1541). Overcoming Narváez’sarmy proved no great task; Cortés suborned 900 of hisopponent’s men and employed them in defeating the balance of the expeditionary army. Narváez lost an eye in the
battle, and it was he—not Cortés—who was placed underarrest.While Spaniard fought Spaniard in the Mexican countryside, Alvarado, back in Tenochtitlán, initiated an actionthat was to typify white-Indian relations for the next fourcenturies. He turned his soldiers on the people, givingthem leave to slaughter all men, women, and children.

This provoked the people, who had so far meekly submitted to conquest, to rise up in heated rebellion. They laidsiege to the palace where the Spaniards had taken refugeand where soldiers now held Moctezuma captive. Returning in the midst of this rebellion, Cortés took charge of his
men and fought his way into and then out of the palaceand city, plundering what he could as he went. During theevacuation—on June 30, 1520, called by the Spanish theNoche Triste (Sad Night) Moctezuma was murdered.Spanish accounts claimed he had been assassinated by his own people; the Aztecs attributed his death to the Spanish.Cortés was after more than an emperor’s head and thepalace loot. After crushing a revolt at Otumba on July 7,the conquistador prepared to retake Tenochtitlán. Tenmonths after the Spanish fled the city, they returned tobesiege it, destroying Tenochtitlán’s aqueducts and choking off the supply of food. The Aztecs held out for three
months, but what thirst and starvation failed to do, smallpox—apparently carried to Mexico by a black slave in theservice of Narváez—accomplished. On August 13, 1521,the city fell.

Tenochtitlán, and all Mexico, belonged to
Hernán Cortés and, of course, his Most Catholic Majesty,King Charles I (1500–58).Tenochtitlán had been greatly reduced by threemonths of starvation and pestilence, but what remained,
Cortés looted. He enslaved large numbers of Aztecs,branding each of them—probably the first instance of thismost “Western” means of identifying chattel. He torturedthe new king, Cuauhtemoc (1495–1525)—successor toCuitlahuac (dead of smallpox), who had succeededMoctezuma—in an effort to recover the hoard of silverand gold Cortés had left behind in his hasty withdrawalfrom the city, but to no avail. Nevertheless, Cortés wouldmake a fortune from the mining operations that yieldedtin, iron, and other metals, and from harvests of cocoa andcotton he extorted as tribute from the vanquished Aztecs.

Address


Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Historical Battle posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Museum

Send a message to Historical Battle:

Share

Comments

HELLO GOOD PEOPLE OF NIGERIA UK FAIRLY USED SHOES, CLOTHES, BAGS ARE AVAILABLE FOR SALE CONTACT US ON (+234 7083446511) YOUR UK FAIRLY USED SHOES, BAGS 45,000,:::::BALES OF CHILDREN CLOTHED - N,65,000,000 ,
BALE FOR school BAGS 55,000
LADIES MIXED BAGS 55,000 to 95,000
[*] BALE OF UK USED LADIES BRA -
N35,000
[*]BALE OF WOMEN HAIR (800PIECES) 75,000 to-150,000
[*] BALE MEN Shirt(200 PIECES) - N50,000,,000
[*] BALE LADIES MIXED TOPS - N50,,000 to 100,000
[*] BALE OF ORIGINAL SHORTS - N65,000
[*] BALE OF LIGHT SPORTS WEAR - N50,000
[*] BALE OF MEN POLO/T SHIRT MIX - N65,000,000
[*] BALE OF LADIES MIX DRESSES - N65,000
[*] BALE OF MEN SHOES 60,000 - (200 PAIRS) - [*] CHILDREN SHOES (206 PAIRS) - 55,000,000
[*] NOTICE
[ ] BALE OF MIXED UNDERWEAR PANTS 35,000
[*] BALE MIXED SOCKS 30,000/STOCKINGS(20,000)
[*] BALE OF LEGGINGS 45,000
[*] BALE OF MEN JEANS 65 000
all items are AVAILABLE.
[*]BALE OF TORY FOR BABIES. 30,000
[*] ALL ITEMS ARE TOKUNBO
#}