Ancient History

06/27/2024

MYSTERIOUS MOUNT SHASTA

06/27/2024

But this one is not. They really did discover the king of pop

06/27/2024

The Ancient Handbags 👜 On 1 Of the Megalithic 🗿 T-Pillars Of Göbeklitepe 🤔🐆🤔

06/27/2024

06/26/2024

Could it be a door way into the Sphinx!!

06/26/2024

"it doesn't need to be possible, it just has to be true"

So, they're making news again, at least on social media. What are your thoughts on these?

And please know that most of us are all on the same team-the team seeking truths and realities, despite differences of opinions. Let's keep that in mind as we concur, or debate.

Once news was brought forth regarding the "alien mummies", I pretty much instantly dismissed it as a hoax. They might still be, but the more we learn about them, it gets a bit more difficult to shove them in the "hoax-box"

It appears that there may be an active attempt to discredit any authenticity, if indeed these are authentic in nature.

Additionally, the media, from buy-in to dismissive, labeled them as "alien mummies", when in fact, they are not mummies, and they may not be aliens (i.e. beings from another planet).

I thank god for the likes of Gary Nolan and other highly respected scientists who are at the very least open to the possibility that these are authentic corpses that were not fabricated dolls.

Would like to hear other thoughts on this.

06/26/2024

Was at red rocks in Colorado this past weekend, this is from Saturday night ! Can anyone explain this to me?

06/26/2024

84,000 secret books rediscovered within a sealed library of the 11th century Sakaya Monastary, Tibet. 95% have yet to be translated.

06/26/2024

Was walking my dog this morning and saw a rotating blue sky above the moon. I couldn’t get my phone out fast enough to really catch it but I did manage to catch the end of it. It was like looking at the sky during daytime. It was beautiful and scary at the same time.

06/25/2024

Good morning and happy Sunday everybody. Have a great day, be safe out there, and cheers from Berlin... 👽🥰😎

06/25/2024

Hard to be a god or Eclipse during crucifixion. Painting by me. There are several (hundreds) of words about it.

Zecharia Sitchin did an amazing job, but it is surprising that he left the New Testament texts without attention. The astronomical information contained in them significantly complements the hypothesis of the planet Nibiru and makes it more substantiated.

The very first New Testament evidence of Nibiru is the Star of Bethlehem. To date, there are several hypotheses about the appearance of the Star of Bethlehem. It is assumed that it was an unknown comet or a supernova explosion, but these versions do not have sufficient confirmation.

Nevertheless, Vallaam's "star prophecy" from the Old Testament book of numbers foreshadows this event: "I see Him, but not yet; I see Him, but not close. A star rises from Jacob ..."

Here is what is known about the Star of Bethlehem from the New Testament.

"And when Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judea in the days of King Herod, the magi came to Jerusalem from the east and said, 'Where is He who has been born King of the Jews? For we have seen His star in the east and have come to worship Him.'

— Mf. 2:1-2

"They, having listened to the king, went. And behold, the star that they saw in the east went before them, until at last it came and stood over the place where the Child was."

— Mf. 2:9-11

It is also known that having fulfilled its purpose, the star disappeared from the sky when the Magi came to Jerusalem so that Herod could not see it, and then returned again.

Some apocryphal texts contain details not found in the canonical gospel. Usually, the Star of Bethlehem is spoken of briefly, but the First Gospel of James describes it this way: “His star rose bright, and it so surpassed all other stars in heaven in its brightness that they were no longer visible.”

In addition, the star also had other unusual features, because of which St. John Chrysostom and Blessed Theophylact of Bulgaria considered it to be a divine power:

"Hearing about a star, do not think that it was one of the ones we see: no, it was a divine and angelic power that appeared in the form of a star. Therefore, the magi were engaged in the science of stars, then the Lord brought them with this familiar sign for them, like how Peter the fisherman, amazed by the multitude of fish, drew him to Christ. from the north, where Persia is, to the south, where Jerusalem is: but the stars never move from north to south."

- Theophylact of Bulgaria

To summarize: the star appeared in the east, was unusually bright so that it was visible during daylight hours and moved from north to south. For a while she disappeared from the sky but then reappeared.

Now let's put aside this information for a while and consider another astronomical phenomenon from the New Testament - a solar eclipse during the crucifixion of Christ, which occurred according to the scripture in 33 AD.

Most of the texts only briefly say that darkness has come.
The Gospel of Nicodemus reports the following details: “It was the sixth hour and darkness descended on the earth, even until the ninth hour. The sun darkened, and now the veil in the temple was torn into two parts from top to bottom.

In the Gospel of Peter it is written as follows: "It was noon, and darkness found over all Judea,
Many went out with lamps, thinking that night had come...
And at that moment the veil of the temple of Jerusalem was torn in two. And they took the nails out of the hands of the Lord and laid Him on the ground, and the earth shook, and there was great fear. And the sun shone again, and it turned out that it was already the ninth hour."

And Pilate, interrogating the Jews, said to them: “Did you see what happened?” And they answered the ruler: "The sun is eclipsed as it usually happens."

Thanks to modern astronomical calculations, it is reliably known that a solar eclipse by the Moon could not have occurred at that time. But at the same time, the New Testament claims that it happened and at the same time was unusually long.

Now we already have two evidence of unusual astronomical events, which have not yet been confirmed explanation. How do these events relate to Zecharia Sitchin's speculation about Nibiru's orbit?

According to Sitchin, Nibiru has a retrograde (counterclockwise) elongated orbit at an angle to the plane of the eclipticti. At the same time, Nibiru appears in the northern hemisphere, and, crossing the plane of the orbits of the solar system, moves away in the southern. If we take into account that according to the New Offset, the Bethlehem star was visible during daylight hours, then we can conclude that Nibiru appeared in the solar system relative to the Earth from the side of the sun and, having a retrograde orbit, moved towards the Earth. Then given the Earth's rotation, it should have become visible from about the wee hours of rising in the east! With sufficient brightness, it could be seen after dawn, then became invisible due to sunlight and went beyond the western horizon. After that, at dawn, it again rose in the east. And moving from the northern hemisphere to the southern one, each time it gradually shifted from north to south.

Now about the eclipse - could it happen due to the fact that Nibiru passed between the Sun and the Earth? According to the hypothesis of Zecharia Sitchin, Nibiru crosses the solar system in the asteroid belt beyond the orbit of Mars. This makes it impossible for the eclipse of the Sun by the planet Nibiru. Based on the previously proposed model, Nibiru, having appeared from the direction of the Sun, should, after its appearance, go around the earth and become visible at night throughout its stay in the solar system, which, according to Sitchin, lasts about 30 years.

But there is another possible option. In order for it to be possible, it is necessary to slightly correct the hypothesis of the collision of Nibiru with Tiamat and the formation of the Earth. The initial conditions remain the same. In place of the asteroid belt beyond the orbit of Mars was the large water planet Tiamat, in the current orbit of the Earth was the Moon. Nibiru burst into the solar system along an elongated retrograde orbit at an angle to the plane of the ecliptic and passed next to Tiamat, driving its satellites into it - 4 vortices from the Sumerian poem about the creation of the world. Because of this, one part of Tiamat broke off and became an asteroid belt, and the other received a huge depression in the place of the Pacific Ocean and was thrown into the orbit of the Moon, where it is now becoming the Earth.

The correction that should be made to this theory concerns the orbit of Nibiru. The Earth's orbit is quite natural - having received a counter blow, it lost speed and began to fall into a lower orbit around the Sun. On the way, she was picked up by the Moon and she remained in the same orbit with her, and the debris of Tiamat formed the Lunar landscape. As for Nibiru, as a result of the gravitational maneuver, this also lost speed and should move into an orbit closer to the sun. Thus, there is a possibility that Nibiru's orbit may pass between the Earth and the Sun and cause an eclipse.

Prophet Amos:
"And it shall come to pass in that day, says the Lord God, that I will make the sun go down at noon, and darken the earth in the midst of the bright day."

Prophet Zechariah:
"And it will be in that day: there will be no light, the luminaries will be removed.
This day will be the only one known only to the Lord: neither
day or night; only in the evening will light come."

The Bible does not speak of any catastrophic events other than the torn veil of the temple and the shaking of the earth. They are also not mentioned in history, although it is known about earthquakes in Israel before and after these events with an interval of several centuries, but not during them. Only favorable and non-catastrophic floods in the Nile are known from 30 BC. e. and until 155

Now the question arises - how close can Nibiru get to the Earth for a long solar eclipse to occur and not cause a catastrophe?

Doubting my assumption, I asked this question on various astronomical publics. Opinions were greatly divided. But the ultimate conclusion is that a planet larger than Earth could pass close enough to cause an eclipse without causing disaster. The size and mass of Nibiru are not exactly known, so there can be many assumptions, but in any case it will be significantly further than the Moon. In this case, the Earth will slow down, as during the passage of other giant planets, and some climate change.

At the same time, being between the sun and the Earth, Nibiru was not visible during daylight hours and therefore no other evidence remained. And leaving the solar system, it could hide behind the horizon in the southern hemisphere.

This slightly coincides with the hypothesis of the ninth planet of astronomers Brown and Batygin.

Their hypothesis about the 9th planet is based on anomalous deviations in the orbits of small bodies on the outskirts of the solar system. Their elongated orbits are at an angle to the plane of the ecliptic, which contradicts the theory of the formation of the solar system. At the same time, perihelia, the points of their orbits closest to the sun, are grouped in one place. The probability of such a coincidence is 1 out of 100. And just such a result was obtained by astronomers Michael Brown and Konstantin Batygin by introducing the 9th planet with a mass of 5-10 Earth masses in an elongated orbit into the computer model of the solar system.

In their model, the aphelion (far point) of this planet's orbit is in the southern part of the solar system. But due to the slight inclination of the orbits When approaching the sun, the planet enters the northern part and crosses the plane of the ecliptic near the sun, moving from north to south, like the star of Bethlehem.

True, the perihelion of the orbit of the 9th planet in the Brown-Batygin model is not between the Earth and the Sun, but beyond the orbit of Pluto. But this is an approximate model and it is constantly refined.

The suggestion that Nibiru was the star of Bethlehem and eclipsed the Sun at the time of the crucifixion removes some of the contradictions from Sitchin's hypothesis. He wrote that the Flood was caused by the approach of the Earth to Nibiru, which caused the glaciers to split. Such an approach would not be possible if Nibiru crossed the solar system in the asteroid belt, much further than the safe distance. It is quite another matter when Nibiru almost crosses the orbit of the Earth.

Secondly, it explains why ancient people depicted it as a red winged disk. If it were in the asteroid belt it would look like any other star or planet.

And thirdly, this gives a different chronology for the appearance of Nibiru in the solar system, which roughly coincides with some significant events. Moreover, this version differs from Stchin's chronology by only about 500 years. Such a disparity could well have developed over a long period of time.

If we take the year 0 of the birth of Christ as the starting point and count back two periods of 3600 years, we get an interesting coincidence. Around 7500 B.C. (a difference of 200 years) climate changes have occurred on Earth, which are associated with a global cataclysm. In 7220 BC. e. there was an eruption of Mount Edgecumb volcano in Alaska and a large outflow of fresh water from the Black Sea into the Aegean Sea, which could be the result of the approach of Nibiru. And the greatest cataclysm occurred in 7640 BC. e. There is a theory that Tolman's hypothetical comet hit the Earth, but little is known about this.
3879 years after that, in 3761 BC. e., according to the Bible, the creation of the world took place. After 3761 years, year 0 has come - a new starting point has been assigned. These intervals differ from the period of 3600 years by a couple of centuries, which may have different explanations. One way or another, the next appearance of Nibiru should occur around the year 3600. Maybe in 3666 - three sixes)

Then it becomes obvious what kind of Kingdom of Heaven (has a double meaning based on Scripture) and the Second Coming the New Testament speaks.

06/25/2024

Problem solved 😂

06/24/2024

THE WORLD AND ITS MYSTERIES.. THE MOUNTAIN OF KAILASH.
( Mysterious Mount Kailash )
… See more

06/24/2024

Interesting. These things have been seen all over the planet for decades. Space Carrier?

06/24/2024

Good afternoon and happy Sunday everybody. I finally found the key I was looking for, so I'm going on a little ride today… I got room for one more, who's coming? 👽🥰😎

06/24/2024

Abuna Yemata Guh, perched at an astonishing height of 2,580 meters in the Gheralta mountains of Ethiopia, is often regarded as the most inaccessible church in the world.

Reaching it involves a strenuous climb, including scaling vertical cliffs and navigating perilous narrow ledges.

Believed to date back to the 5th century, the church was carved out of a sandstone pinnacle by Abuna Yemata, one of the Nine Saints who spread Christianity in Ethiopia. Inside, visitors find vivid frescoes depicting biblical scenes, preserved over centuries.

This remarkable blend of natural beauty and spiritual heritage makes Abuna Yemata Guh a truly awe-inspiring site...

06/23/2024

The Pyramid of the Magician / El Adivino | Maya Ruins of Uxmal Mexico 🇲🇽 🤔🐆🤔

06/23/2024

Have some few questions to ask, thank you for your answers in advance

Q1 do aliens really looks like this , in the picture below 👇👇👇

Q2 what's the difference between Aliens and the Archons ?

Q3 aliens or archons evil?

Explain with facts please. Thank you

06/23/2024

Happy Friday everybody. Have a great day, be safe out there, and cheers from Berlin... 👽🥰😎

06/22/2024

What is the world's greatest unsolved mystery?